A federal decide denies abstract judgment, sending MLC’s prolonged mechanical royalties battle in opposition to Pandora to trial.
A federal decide has denied abstract judgment within the Mechanical Licensing Collective’s (MLC) huge 7,000-page royalties case in opposition to Pandora, ruling that if it took that many pages to argue, then a jury ought to undoubtedly evaluation it.
The MLC is suing curated web radio service Pandora for greater “interactive” mechanical royalties, arguing that the platform’s free tier presents a “Sponsored Premium Entry” characteristic by which customers watch advertisements for the power to play particular songs on demand. The MLC argues that this characteristic transforms Pandora from a “non-interactive” radio service into an “interactive” platform, just like Spotify, and that this variation necessitates greater royalty funds.
Pandora has denied the MLC’s claims, calling them “plainly and unmistakably improper,” and accuses the collective of abusing its energy.
Each side requested a decide to enter judgment of their favor earlier this 12 months. However Choose Eli Richardson declined to evaluation the “corpulent” 7,000 pages of 263 paperwork offered by each MLC and Pandora to decide.
“The courtroom in its discretion finds that it could be extra environment friendly to take care of all contested points and study the fulsome factual document at trial relatively than expending the (very substantial) judicial assets essential to eliminate the motions,” wrote Choose Richardson.
Regardless, the decide famous that even when he did take the time to evaluation all of the paperwork within the case, a trial would nonetheless probably be unavoidable.
“If a celebration has to file 1000’s of pages and a whole bunch of paperwork to elucidate why there’s nothing for a jury to determine […] then the amount suggests that there’s certainly one thing for the jury to see,” the decide added.
A trial date has not but been scheduled. It’s additionally potential the 2 events may attain a settlement earlier than the matter reaches a jury.
The decide’s resolution follows an identical lawsuit in opposition to Pandora’s guardian firm, SiriusXM, filed by SoundExchange again in 2023. SoundExchange accused SiriusXM of underpaying recorded royalties by manipulating its bundled presents—an allegation that the MLC additionally made in opposition to Spotify in a lawsuit filed after its motion in opposition to Pandora in 2024.




