What was revolutionary in regards to the French Revolution? Modern critics reminiscent of Edmund Burke lamented that France’s tyro politicians had squandered a golden alternative to resume with a useable previous. Had they discovered nothing to salvage from their very own traditions, he urged, they may but have imitated ‘clever examples’ out there overseas, notably the constitutional mannequin of their British neighbours. As a substitute, they have been hazarding an untested path woe-betided with epochal hazard. Such auguries, nonetheless, tended to ignore the revolution’s shock-of-the-new logic and attraction. As rhapsodised by Louis Antoine de Saint-Simply, a number one younger gun in the course of the Terror, there must be no imitation of something ‘that has occurred earlier than us’, as a result of ‘heroism has no fashions’. For Alexis de Tocqueville, in search of to make sense of all of it in Nineteenth-century retrospect, Burke had misconstrued the revolution ‘going down earlier than his eyes’ – one which broke new floor exactly as a result of ‘there could possibly be no query of placing the clock again’.
John Hardman introduces his chronicle of the French Revolution by evoking how the occasions of 1789 and past would certainly put a brand new sort of ‘revolution’ on the world historic map. Within the twentieth century France’s revolutionary script would turn out to be the ‘mannequin’ for Russia and China. And but, because the writer dryly observes, these have been hardly ‘completely satisfied experiences’. To make sure, Hardman doesn’t pin blame on the era of 1789 for latter-day revolutionary misadventures, seeing the French case as one-of-a-kind. As a substitute, he goals to discover how the political historical past of the French Revolution would turn out to be ‘a report of failure, instability and internecine strife’.
Over the ultimate years of the ancien régime the French authorities countenanced root-and-branch reform to beat a fiscal malaise which had reached disaster level. In 1787 Louis XVI’s finance minister, Charles-Alexandre de Calonne, interlinked the general public curiosity with that of the state whereas lambasting ‘historical prejudices that point appears to have hallowed’. This comment from an official rostrum, Hardman notes, constituted ‘one of the subversive notions ever uttered earlier than 1789’. The quick goal was the tax privileges of the the Aristocracy. However, by the identical logic, any side of the Outdated Regime would possibly turn out to be open to query.
This was exactly what would transpire as soon as the Estates-Normal, convened in 1789 in a bid to exit the political quagmire, seized the initiative by reinventing itself because the ‘Nationwide Meeting’. Louis promptly sought the meeting’s enforced dissolution, bringing troops into the Paris area for the aim. However these manoeuvres have been forestalled by a violent widespread rebellion within the capital, the place the seizure of the Bastille would save the revolution – and radically remodel its stakes. The meeting set about reshaping the nation and drafting a brand new structure. It did so whereas retaining a restricted function for a monarchy, and certainly for the (mistrusted) incumbent king. The upshot of this was what Hardman phrases ‘two rival legitimacies’. Basically, although, as recounted by one of many meeting’s leaders, Antoine Barnave, the autonomous legislative physique had turn out to be ‘the primarily republican foundation of the structure’; monarchy was a lingering anomaly.
Drafting a structure couldn’t finish a revolution whose extension was changing into the lodestar of an array of burgeoning political actors, together with ideologues reminiscent of Maximilien Robespierre. From a high-politics vantage level, as Hardman underlines, a ‘deadly’ early selection was an meeting decree which barred members of the legislature from changing into authorities ministers. This fomented the ‘harmful phantasm’ that the perfect of unity within the political sphere ‘must be the norm’, hindering the institution of a functioning celebration system and entrenching battle with the chief.
Antagonism was heightened by Louis’ preliminary willpower to push his perceived rights to the restrict. He then switched, in mid-1791, to a dangerous double-game of seeming acquiescence whereas secretly plotting to flee Paris within the abortive flight to Varennes. The king was introduced again to Paris and ostensibly reinstated; the structure was lastly enacted, and a brand new meeting convened. From the spring of 1792, nonetheless, the revolution morphed into a global battle embattling France in opposition to a collection of European powers. Battle turbocharged political radicalisation, particularly for the reason that royal court docket seemed to be in league with France’s counter-revolutionary enemies. A bloody day of orchestrated revolt in Paris in August 1792 sealed the monarchy’s demise, with the deposed king subsequently placed on trial; he was executed in January 1793.
The nascent republic which adopted would haven’t any head of state. Nonetheless, a brand new and extra coherent relationship between legislature and govt did coalesce within the form of the Committee of Public Security, drawn from members of the Nationwide Conference, because the meeting’s latest iteration was identified: ‘After three years of chaos, France had returned to what it had been earlier than the revolution: an administrative state.’ In the meantime, an ever-more pointed valorisation of unity would foster the violence of the Terror. That ended in the summertime of 1794, with Robespierre, Saint-Simply, and their allies despatched to the guillotine. However this denouement additionally eclipsed the revolution’s radical promise: ‘Property had changed fraternity.’
Whereas a lot of this saga is acquainted, Hardman brings his personal twists to the story. His ebook showcases what a high-politics prism can supply to an understanding of the revolution. Drawing on his earlier work as a biographer of Louis XVI, he’s notably efficient in presenting the angle of the royal court docket, at one level even imagining ‘the speech the king might need made’ at his trial. Nonetheless, as Tocqueville’s admonition to Burke serves to recall, the revolution additionally prolonged far past conventional conceptions of politics. A lot of what was important to the revolution thus tends to be misplaced in a slender political focus; and an ancillary advantage of Hardman’s ebook is that it helps us to fathom this too.
-
The French Revolution: A Political Historical past
John Hardman
Yale College Press, 384pp, £25
Purchase from bookshop.org (affiliate hyperlink)
Simon Macdonald is Lecturer in Fashionable European Historical past at College School London.
