Campaigning for his third time period as president in 2022, Lula da Silva ran on an easy message: making Brazil “blissful once more”. Now, midway via his third time period, macroeconomic indicators paint a reasonably rosy image of the nation’s trajectory beneath his administration: GDP development exceeded expectations, and the unemployment price fell to historic ranges. On the worldwide stage, the president is well known as a number one voice in opposition to the authoritarianism and neo-imperialist aspirations of Donald Trump. But at residence, Lula’s reputation is declining.
As Lula 3.0’s second half unfolds, limitations within the Staff’ Occasion mannequin persist. After recovering from a coup try on 8 January 2023, lower than every week earlier than the inauguration, the brand new authorities swiftly restored or enhanced a few of the Staff’ Occasion’s flagship social applications that had been weakened beneath Jair Bolsonaro, reminiscent of Bolsa Família (money transfers to poor households), Minha Casa Minha Vida (development and financing of inexpensive housing items), and Mais Médicos (provision of physicians in susceptible areas). Nevertheless, the primary months of the administration, again in 2023, confirmed that the varied applications’ longevity could be contingent on increasing their funding supply: state income.
Lula wager on a Keynesian formulation that sought to spice up demand via elevated state intervention and funding – a key characteristic of his earlier administrations. In August 2023, the federal government set in movement a brand new iteration of the Programa de Aceleração do Crescimento (Development Acceleration Program), geared toward massive infrastructure tasks in a number of areas, together with transportation, inexperienced power and digital transition. In January 2024, a brand new industrial coverage was launched to foster technological innovation and strengthen home industries. Nevertheless, whereas funding charges grew an ideal deal from 2023 to 2024, on the present 17.6 p.c, they’re nonetheless significantly down from the typical 20 p.c achieved from 2008 to 2013, throughout Lula’s second presidency and the primary Rousseff years. With out the growth of such charges and, therefore, the assure of long-term development and better income, Lula and the broader Staff’ Occasion venture is compromised.
One can argue that adjustments within the worldwide state of affairs, notably post-pandemic combined tendencies in commodity costs, constrain what Lula 3.0 can ship. Nevertheless, the federal government’s personal fiscal method needs to be thought-about the primary hindrance. The Novo Arcabouço Fiscal (New Fiscal Framework), championed by Minister of Finance Fernando Haddad, presents itself as a extra versatile different to inflexible fiscal targets however finally reinforces a restrictive logic that prioritizes debt management over social funding. By tying spending to financial efficiency and capping expenditures even in intervals of prosperity, the framework limits the federal government’s means to reply to urgent social wants, spend money on long-term transformations, and tackle structural points that perpetuate inequality. The federal government, and the minister specifically, justifies these selections as pragmatism, disguising an austerity rationale as fiscal duty.
Foto: Ricardo Stuckert / Lula Official. Supply: Wikimedia Commons
The Staff’ Occasion by no means sidelined issues with balanced budgets in earlier administrations, however Lula 3.0 has escalated this precedence, as attested by the set of measures to “improve fiscal duty” authorized on the finish of 2024. Key parts embody cuts to schooling funds and a cap on above-inflation raises to the minimal wage. The latter influences different expenditures, together with unemployment and social safety advantages, together with stricter eligibility standards for social applications, reminiscent of incapacity advantages and Bolsa Família. The progressive social funding measures the federal government has introduced – reminiscent of tax exemptions for people incomes as much as 5,000 reais monthly and a super-rich tax, geared toward unique and off-shore funding funds – pale in comparison with the federal government’s defence of fiscal conservatism.
The battle between focusing on inequality via public spending and following the dictates of the market leaves Lula 3.0 with no possibility however to additional wager on agribusiness and mining to be able to generate much-needed revenues and stop severe financial destabilization within the close to future. Take, as an illustration, the current proposal to discover oil and gasoline deposits close to the mouth of the Amazon River by Petrobras, the nationwide petroleum firm, a prospect criticized by the federal government’s personal federal environmental company.
With out progressive structural transformation, Lula 3.0 won’t be able to maneuver the Brazilian financial system away from neo-extractivism, as left-wing critics of earlier Staff’ Occasion administrations have identified. And in addition to producing contradictions from an environmental perspective, a degree strongly highlighted by Indigenous activists in Brazil, the neo-extractive entice reinforces the dependent nature of the Brazilian financial system – its continued reliance on exporting uncooked supplies and low-value items to wealthier nations, slightly than creating a diversified industrial base – and leaves little leverage to push again in opposition to the brand new Trump administration.
*
Lula’s third presidency also needs to be assessed when it comes to the institutional leverage the fitting wing presently holds. Brazil’s multiparty political system has at all times required the making of alliances to construct majorities in each the Home and the Senate, pushing the coalition in energy into negotiations throughout the political spectrum. Those that sided with Lula within the newest run knew his new presidency would face challenges within the parliament due to the election of a extra sizable far right-wing cohort to Congress, which might compel the president to achieve out past the coalition that led to his victory, towards centre-to-right and historically right-wing forces that had merged with bolsonarismo. In the beginning of his third time period, Lula granted a few of Bolsonaro’s outdated allies cupboard seats in alternate for assist for the federal government’s proposals and conceded to right-wing forces in public security and the army. For instance, Lula assigned José Múcio, a favourite among the many armed forces, the place of Minister of Defence.
Nevertheless, Bolsonaro-era adjustments to the administration of the federal price range, which allowed lawmakers to allocate parts of presidency funds at their discretion, have disrupted the stability between government and legislative energy. Regardless of Brazil’s supreme court docket having dominated Bolsonaro’s slush fund unlawful, lawmakers are not depending on the administration for entry to authorities spoils and have little incentive to cooperate with it. The broad right-wing bloc has exploited this dynamic to exert stress from each instructions – demanding deeper austerity measures whereas concurrently blaming the administration for the hurt these very insurance policies could inflict on the nation.
The explanation the harm isn’t higher for Lula 3.0 is as a result of the fitting wing is presently in dysfunction. Bolsonaro stays the central reference for the conservative mass motion consolidated along with his election in 2018, however the demonstrations in his assist are shrinking and his authorized troubles have significantly worsened, since he’s now indicted on the January 8 costs by the Supreme Court docket; the opportunity of arrest following a trial within the fall is actual. On the similar time, no different right-wing persona has been capable of declare themselves because the inheritor of bolsonarismo but. A number of names, reminiscent of Bolsonaro’s spouse Michelle, the São Paulo governor Tarcísio de Freitas, and Minas Gerais, the governor Romeu Zema, have been floated as options. The long run is unclear.
Such dynamics marked the nationwide municipal elections that unfolded in October and November final yr. The Proper gained 78 p.c of the disputed seats (or roughly 4,300 municipalities) in a single spherical; the Left was overwhelmed in many of the 52 main cities the place its candidates competed within the second spherical, beneath the runoff format, and its mayoralties fell from 863 to 752 for the reason that earlier elections, in 2020. Certainly, most second-round runoffs pitted centre-right to far-right views in opposition to each other, successfully excluding a progressive dialog altogether.
The case of São Paulo – the nation’s largest metropolis – is especially noteworthy. After a robust exhibiting in 2020, housing motion chief and Lula-endorsed candidate Guilherme Boulos was well-positioned to problem conservative incumbent mayor Ricardo Nunes. Nevertheless, an surprising third contender, web celeb coach Pablo Marçal, got here only a few thousand votes near advancing to the second spherical. Working an aggressive marketing campaign in opposition to the “institution”, Marçal was capable of (re)energize a broad working-class and middle-class base in opposition to “wokeness” and for a pro-market agenda. His efficiency is a testomony to the power of the far proper and its present capability to impress individuals and form the talk within the nation. Boulos couldn’t match the combative method Marçal delivered to the dispute and will achieve no additional floor for the Left. In the meantime, Marçal’s failure to advance to the second spherical and Nunes’s battle to unify the fitting from the onset replicate divisions nonetheless to be bridged by conservatives within the months to come back.
Regardless of these fractures, the Proper’s narrative capability stays robust, due to the net militia consolidated within the years of Bolsonaro’s administration. Lula 3.0 has confronted a decentralized but extremely coordinated effort to unfold misinformation and foster conservative and market-friendly values within the nation. When the state of Rio Grande do Sul was destroyed via document rainfall and flooding in 2024, rumors that the federal government was unable to reply to the catastrophe and had even deserted the inhabitants flooded social media and WhatsApp and Telegram channels, swaying anxieties concerning the tragedy towards anti-state sentiment. In early 2025, the federal government revoked a choice to observe a real-time cost system that permits instantaneous transfers between financial institution accounts, following right-wing on-line allegations that the choice was meant to additional tax working individuals, notably these within the gig and repair industries.
This on-line militia not solely spreads misinformation but in addition serves as an ideological incubator, systematically nurturing radicalization via a continuing stream of memes, edited movies, and broadcasts framing authoritarian actions as righteous resistance. When Brazilian authorities arrested a number of members of an elite military unit in November 2024 for 2022 plot to assassinate then-president-elect Lula, his choose for vp, Geraldo Alckmin, and Justice Alexandre de Moraes, whose selections have hindered the bolsonarista motion, a web-based echo chamber amplified conspiratorial narratives, justified political violence, and solid the perpetrators as patriots resisting a corrupt and illegitimate regime. Following the January 8 riot, these similar digital platforms shortly shifted gears to attract decontextualized comparisons with left-wing demonstrations, downplaying the gravity of the assault on democracy.
*
On this context, Lula’s declining reputation ought to come as no shock. Approval scores have dropped throughout all areas, and whereas Lula 3.0 has managed to stabilize the financial system and restore some key social applications, these good points stay fragile beneath the load of fiscal conservatism, an uncooperative legislature, and a political atmosphere saturated by disinformation. The correct-wing opposition has maintained its grip on the general public creativeness via a potent mixture of narrative warfare and institutional leverage. In the meantime, Eduardo Bolsonaro, now residing within the US, works to increase transnational alliances able to making use of exterior stress on Brazil’s political area, outsourcing the harassment of political opponents to worldwide companions.
Lula’s third time period is formed by a profound incongruity: whereas the Left holds the manager, it governs from a defensive place, making repeated concessions to market and conservative forces in hopes of sustaining governance. The price of this technique is excessive: It demobilizes the favored front-style alliance that introduced Lula to the presidency for the third time, erodes the administration’s transformative capability, and leaves the broader Left susceptible to the Proper’s relentless ideological advance. For liberals and progressives worldwide, Lula’s predicament presents a lesson. Ceding floor to the fitting wing doesn’t guarantee stability and will speed up backsliding. The problem is to withstand the false safety of moderation.
If Lula 3.0 is to depart a legacy past mere harm management, it would require a political recalibration – one which reclaims the initiative, reinvests in common group, and confronts head-on the structural constraints that presently dictate the phrases of progressive governance in Brazil. With out such a shift, the administration dangers turning into a tragic case research within the limits of left-wing energy beneath right-wing hegemony.
