This week we’re going to take a short break from our collection on hoplites (I, II, IIIa, IIIb) to handle a broader query in how we perceive the mechanics of warfare with contact weapons, which is the mechanics of the idea of a ‘battle pulse.’ This notion, that entrance strains involved may sometimes withdraw to catch their breath, change wounded males on the entrance or just to alleviate the psychological stress of the preventing retains arising within the feedback and is value addressing by itself. As a result of whereas it is a vital query for understanding any variety of contact warfare (as a result of ‘pulse’ proponents insist on the heartbeat as being a common characteristic of contact warfare, not restricted to any explicit tradition), it’s each very related to understanding hoplites, but in addition emerged as an extension of the argument about othismos that prolonged into Roman warfare.
There’s something of an irony that we’re briefly disengaging from our dialogue of hoplites to debate if hoplites briefly disnegaged from battle.
So our query right here is, “was the preventing on the level of contact between two formations of heavy infantry a steady run of preventing or did it proceed in pulses and bursts and if the latter, of what nature may they’ve been?” I ought to notice that the traditional expression right here is to explain the sparring on the line of contact as a ‘collection of duels’ however anybody who has watched or participated in experiments in contact-line preventing will instantly acknowledge they aren’t ever a ‘collection of duels’ as any given combatant on the entrance shifting into measure is getting into measure of a number of enemies and so could assault or be attacked by any of them (and certainly, placing the man to the left or proper of the man in entrance of you, catching them unawares, is usually helpful). So the road of contact is just not a collection of 1-on-1s however slightly a rolling collection of ‘several-on-severals’ with every man having his personal set of ‘a number of,’ relying on the size of the weapons used.
Now earlier than we rush in, I need to make a clarification of two phrases I’m going to make use of right here that may in any other case be complicated. I’m going to make a distinction right here between ‘measure‘ and ‘contact.’ This isn’t some well-established distinction, so I’m bending these phrases a bit to clarify a unique that I believe issues. After I say measure right here, I imply the attain of the contact weapons the boys have, how far they’ll truly ship a strike. That’s going to differ a bit based mostly on the weapons they’ve, nevertheless it’s going to be round 1-2 meters.
After I say contact what I imply is a bit looser: two formations standing just a few yards aside is perhaps out of measure, however they’re definitely involved in that neither can maneuver freely and the boys within the entrance of each have to be centered on their enemies instantly ahead as a result of anybody might sprint into measure to strike at any time. For these models to maneuver out of contact, I’d argue they should again up a good bit extra, maybe out to one thing like ‘javelin attain’ which with the heaviest of javelins is perhaps round 20-25 meters. As we’re going to see, there’s an enormous distinction between being simply outdoors measure at maybe 2 or 3 meters away and being at ‘javelin vary’ at say, 15 meters away. However to be clear: measure right here is the nearer proximity, contact is the looser, extra distant proximity.
However first, as at all times, in the event you like what you’re studying, please share it as I depend on word-of-mouth to search out readers! And in the event you actually prefer it, you possibly can assist this challenge over at Patreon; I don’t promise to not use the cash to purchase a full hoplite panoply, however I additionally don’t not promise to do this. And in order for you updates each time a brand new publish seems, you possibly can click on beneath for e mail updates or comply with me on Twitter and Bluesky for updates when posts go reside and my common musings; I’ve largely shifted over to Bluesky (I keep some de minimis presence on Twitter), provided that it has develop into a a lot better place for historic dialogue than Twitter.
Whence the Pulse
We ought to start with a short historical past of the idea of the ‘battle pulse’ in historical warfare and luckily this may be fairly transient.
As you’ll recall from our historiography on hoplites and Michael Taylor’s visitor publish on the ebook, John Keegan’s The Face of Battle (1976) had fairly an affect. It impressed Victor Davis Hanson to basically replicate the method in writing Western Means of Warfare, kicking off the fashionable interval of hoplite debates, nevertheless it additionally had imitators within the examine of the Roman military, most notably Adrian Goldsworthy. Now I believe it’s value noting that’s one thing of an necessary delay right here: when Adrian Goldsworthy goes to jot down The Roman Military at Warfare, 100 BC – AD 200 (1997), WWoW (1989) has been out for almost a decade and whereas the full-throated heterodox imaginative and prescient of Myths and Realities hadn’t arrived but, it was clearly coming. By this level, specifically, Peter Krentz, writing article after article, had punched some fairly important holes in parts of orthodoxy, together with the shoving-othismos. So when Goldsworthy (and Philip Saban, working on the identical time) go to use a Keegan-style Face of Battle method to the Romans, they’re doing so downstream of the hoplite debate.
And so in a way you need to perceive Goldsworthy and Sabin (and Zhmodikov, to whom we’ll come shortly) as basically the extension of hoplite heterodoxy into the Roman sphere; you possibly can see this, I believe, fairly clearly of their writing (and in flip they’re relied upon and cited by newer hoplite heterodox writers). Besides, after all, the scholarship on Roman warfare by no means had something remotely as inflexible or implausible because the ‘sturdy’ orthodox hoplite mannequin, so the modifications to our understanding of Roman battle that these fellows provide are extra modest.
The start line of this burst (dare we are saying ‘pulse?’) of Roman-legion-heterodoxy is P. Sabin, “The Mechanics of Battle within the Second Punic Warfare” BICS 67 (1996), adopted very quickly be the aforementioned A. Goldsworthy The Roman Military at Warfare, 100 BC – AD 200 (1997) after which clarified and restated with Sabin, “The Face of Roman Battle” JRS 90 (2000). Basically Sabin raises the query first, noting that our sources typically describe Roman battles within the Center and Late Republic as lasting a number of hours (sometimes one to a few) and noting that neither the variety of casualties described nor the boundaries of human endurance could be in line with a steady alternate of sword blows for 3 hours. Therefore, Sabin figures, the Romans will need to have moved out and in of contact, which in flip additionally helps him make sense of how battles within the Second Punic Warfare appeared so typically contain a formation getting ‘pushed’ backwards (not actually, after all) important distances to create pockets or holes with out collapsing. I ought to notice that Sabin doesn’t actually get into how far out of contact these actions is perhaps.
Goldsworthy then brings to this drawback the work of S.L.A. Marshall in Males in opposition to Fireplace (1947). Marshall had argued that solely a small portion of troopers in WWII had truly used their weapons, an extension of Ardant du Picq’s should-be-more-famous maxim, “Man doesn’t enter battle to combat, however for victory. He does every thing that he can to keep away from the primary and acquire the second.” Goldsworthy sought to use this perception to Roman fight and argued that likewise within the entrance line of a Roman legion, many males, certainly “nearly all of troopers” even within the entrance rank will need to have performed basically no significant preventing, principally staying secure behind their shields. It appears value noting that this perception is being utilized by analogy – nobody ever had an opportunity to check contact warfare on this means – and so whereas I believe there’s an perception right here going again to Ardant du Picq, it isn’t clear to me that the straight-forward utility of very trendy proof of fight participation with weapons might be utilized to fight with contact weapons with out appreciable hazards. Goldsworthy additionally imagines Roman maniples – the fundamental maneuver unit of the legion in battle – extra as ‘clouds’ of males preventing (a form of presaging of van Wees’ skirmishing hoplites) slightly than a coherent mass with males having a particular, assigned place within the formation. As an alternative, braver people may hype up the entire group to make an enormous push into contact, bringing the ‘cloud’ of troopers ahead, however males have been equally capable of hold again within the ‘cloud’ as a result of there isn’t a lot sense of an assigned place.
However methods to hold that up for just a few hours?
The answer was the ‘battle pulse.’ Sabin imagines Roman battle as a “pure stand-off punctuated by interval and localized prices into contact.” On this imaginative and prescient total Roman maniples may functionally withdraw to javelin vary for prolonged durations to catch their breath, alternate some missiles and get well. That is, in principle, a separate course of from the Roman triple acies having the second (principes) and third (triarii) ranks transfer ahead to take over the combat.
So to be clear, what’s being described right here after we speak about ‘battle pulses’ is an motion on the entrance line that consists of pulses and lulls, the place within the lulls, the 2 strains withdraw out of measure (nicely out of measure, by implication) to momentarily relaxation and reconstitute, earlier than the ‘pulse’ when one aspect rushes again into contact, precipitating one other spherical of preventing.
This imaginative and prescient of battle then acquired key assist with A. Zhmodikov, “Roman Republican Heavy Squaddies in Battle (IV-II Centuries B.C.)” Historia 49.1 (2000). Previous to Zhmodikov, the final mannequin for Roman infantry fight was ‘volley-and-charge:’ the hastati and principes superior and hurled their pila on the outset of an engagement earlier than closing in for a decisive motion with swords. Zhmodikov as a substitute pulls collectively the entire proof for javelin use and argues that pila remained in use over the entire battle. This was within the second fairly necessary as a result of it solved an issue that Goldsworthy and Sabin confronted which is that our historical sources on battles nearly by no means describe something resembling the prolonged pause between pulses: we get pushes within the sources however not fairly often can we hear ‘lulls’ described (in stark distinction to their frequency in sources for gunpowder warfare, I’d notice). When a drive is described as shifting backward, it’s usually as a result of they’re routing or being pushed, not as a result of they’re mutually disengaging. Zhmodikov’s article thus promised to supply an evidentiary foundation that the Goldsworthy-Sabin ‘pulse’ mannequin in any other case lacked, albeit fairly not directly so (‘these guys throw a lot of javelins, so there have to be pauses’ is just not the identical as ‘the sources inform us there are pauses.’)
However notice that Goldsworthy and Sabin are in search of to elucidate Roman fight proof and to do this they’ve resorted to common arguments about human endurance and psychology as a result of they do not need a lot direct supply proof for the lulls of their pulse mannequin (against this, I’d argue, the heartbeat itself – the ‘push’ – is attested). Consequently, this can be a principle developed to elucidate Roman warfare, which was due to the lack of direct testimony within the sources is as a substitute posited as a common rule of fight (for the reason that solely argument obtainable is one from human endurance and psychological functionality), from the place it then will get utilized to hoplites and dismounted knights and Landsknechte and so forth. So now we have to debate it on this Roman context, however with a key warning: Greeks will not be Romans and the Roman tactical and broader institutional army programs weren’t very very similar to Greek ones. Or, as Ardant du Picq quips:
The Gaul, a idiot in struggle, used barbarian ways. After the primary shock, he was at all times crushed by the Greeks and Romans.
The Greek, a warrior, but in addition a politician, had ways far superior to these of the Gauls and the Asiatics.
The Roman, a politician above all, with whom struggle was solely a method, needed good means. He had no illusions. He took into consideration human weak point and he found the legion.
However that is merely affirming what ought to be demonstrated.
(It isn’t, actually, clear to me that ‘The Greek’ had superior ways to ‘the Asiatics’ by which Ardant du Picq means the Persians. The Macedonians definitely did, however that’s a separate query).
What Pulse
So provided that scholarship, why aren’t my discussions of hoplite ways or, certainly, Roman ways, filled with discussions of pulses?
As a result of I don’t suppose they have been full of pulses, or extra appropriately, I don’t suppose they have been filled with what I’m going to name macro-pulses, however they did embrace a lot of what I’m going to name micro-pulses, as a result of I believe you will need to distinguish between the 2.
In a micro-pulse, what we’re actually describing is ‘withdrawing to measure’ – the combatants separate not an enormous quantity, however just some steps outdoors of the attain of their weapons (placing distance right here is termed ‘measure’ so shifting ‘into measure’ means shifting into an opponent’s placing vary (to strike your self) and so too ‘out of measure.’) I don’t suppose two opposing strains locked shields in opposition to one another and stayed in measure for minutes or hours on finish. That doesn’t appear bodily or psychologically potential. It might produce the casualty drawback Sabin identifies and psychologically, as Ardant du Picq factors to, males are going to need to pull out of attain of their opponents weapons and that psychological drive goes to develop into swiftly overpowering. Anybody who watches fight sports activities or HEMA sparring, as an apart, can see this tendency for fighters to tug out of measure however stay ‘involved’ (shut sufficient to maneuver again into measure at any second) for themselves.
So I’ve no drawback with the ‘micro-pulse,’ and certainly, I believe they will need to have been regularly occurring down the road, with males or teams of males stepping ahead into measure to ship one or two strikes (and sure take just a few in return) earlier than backing out. And naturally that sample may also serve to preserve the boys’s stamina, as a result of the durations of actually intense bodily motion – the throwing of blows or blocks – is perhaps interspersed with longer durations of watching and smaller probing strikes. I admit, it will be actually fascinating to see how lengthy a set of cheap match reenactors might sustain this type of pulsing combat, by no means withdrawing a lot various steps past measure. The important thing could be operating the experiment as close to to exhaustion as potential, as a result of we must anticipate battle to push males to the very limits of endurance as they battle to outlive.
The broader query then is the macro-pulse, the place we think about the strains really break contact to the purpose the place they’re far sufficient aside that males can’t sprint ahead again into measure rapidly. Now Goldsworthy-Sabin-Zhmodikov don’t, to my studying, draw a distinction between these two kinds of pulses, so it’s onerous to inform which they imply, however once they speak about prolonged javelin exchanges late in battles or lulls lengthy sufficient to modify out wounded or fatigued males I learn that as a macro-pulse (or extra appropriately a ‘macro-lull‘). To the diploma that these authors truly intend what I’ve outlined above as a micro-pulse, then I don’t suppose I’ve any disagreement with them on this level. However as a substitute what they appear to think about is a battle that consists primarily of macro-lulls, punctuated by micro-pulses, the place formations spend lots of time at ‘javelin attain’ of one another (so separated by maybe 10 or 20 yards as a substitute of 10 or 20 toes).
Critically, such a big disengagement requires the complete formation to maneuver. A micro-pulse can work by having the entrance ranks merely accordion into the again ranks, closing the ‘vertical’ distance between them, however a macro-pulse requires the rear ranks to actually again up and critically for males to maintain backing up after contact is damaged and thus there is no such thing as a instant stress from the enemy (as a result of the macro-pulse additionally requires the enemy to not advance again to the sting of measure). Certainly, Sabin appears to think about it’s within the context of those macro-pulses that the Roman altering out of battle strains happens, so we’re actually backing up fairly a bit.
Basically, the macro-pulse exists in rigidity then (through Zhmodikov) with a volley-and-charge mannequin (which has no bother incorporating the ‘micro-pulse’ – nobody has ever urged Roman troopers did something like a shoving-othismos). The macro-pulse mannequin additionally usually asserts extra versatile bodily formation, approaching ‘clouds’ or ‘mobs’ of troopers, slightly than a single formation with assigned locations and it isn’t onerous to see how that is smart if this formation is meant to pulse ahead and backwards; against this the older imaginative and prescient of volley-and-charge assumes a daily, considerably inflexible formation, not infinitely inflexible as we’ll see, however there’s at the very least the notion of a block of males who’re meant for essentially the most half to keep up relative place. In essence, this macro-pulse mannequin assumes that these fellows are doing one thing nearer to what we’d name ‘dense skirmishing’ in ‘clouds’ slightly than formations spending most of their time nicely out of measure for contact weapons. You’ll be able to see how this works as a continuation of the hoplite-as-skirmisher ‘sturdy’ heterodox imaginative and prescient.
To place it bluntly, I believe micro-pulses occur and are in proof within the sources, nonetheless I believe macro-pulses – conditions the place the 2 strains really disengage for a interval with out both routing– appear very pretty uncommon and the supply proof for them as frequent occurrences is truly fairly skinny.
The Lull Within the Pulse
And it looks like from some quarters after I specific this view there’s a diploma of incredulity that I’d ‘go in opposition to the scholarship’ on a problem that’s handled as ‘solved.’ Which is odd to me as a result of it appears clear that important components of the Goldsworthy-Sabin-Zhmodikov thesis have been softened and even overturned.
An effort to search out Goldsworthy’s pulses-and-lulls within the sources was mounted by Sam Koon, Infantry Fight in Livy’s Battle Narratives (2010). Koon got down to discover the lulls although it’s placing that the clearest instance of a lull can be clearly distinctive: the two-part battle at Zama (202), the place the ‘lull’ may be very overtly and visibly created by the recall of the hastati behind the subsequent line and the re-ordering of the formation, slightly than by a pulse-and-lull mannequin; we’ll come again to this. And there’s definitely some openness to this mannequin. I’m caught, for example by two chapters in The Oxford Handbook of Warfare within the Classical World (2013), eds. B. Campbell and Lawrence Tritle: Michael Sage’s chapter (“The Rise of Rome”) which accepts the Goldsworthy-Sabin-Zhmodikov mannequin and Brian Campbell’s chapter (“Arming Romans”) which implicitly rejects it, asserting a volley-and-charge function for the pilum. However issues with the macro-pulse mannequin emerged.
For one, among the spacing and interval issues that Sabin disregarded as unsolveable (and thus avoids having to account for even flexible-but-real intervals and formations) have been revisited by MT. Taylor, “Roman Infantry Techniques within the Mid-Republic: A Reassessment” Historia 63 (2014) and to a big diploma resolved: there’s a common formation, it has each close-order and modestly-open-order normal intervals and we will additionally gauge to a big diploma the intervals between maniples. The models of the military (and the military itself) have been accordions, not clouds of troopers and males might – and within the sources do – shut as much as obtain missiles or area out to combat in shut fight (sometimes, we’ll get to this, they do the one after which the opposite). Most notably, the intervals between maniples are nearly definitely – at factors explicitly (Sall. Jug. 49.6) – the place the mild infantry (just like the velites, but in addition any slingers or archers) are, which in flip exposes an actual weak point in Zhmodikov, which is a near-total failure to differentiate between heavy infantry throwing their pila and the sunshine infantry velites throwing their lighter javelins (hasta velitaris). The heavy infantry have simply two pila, however the velites carry many javelins, which as you may think has implications for prolonged missile exchanges and meant operate.
However crucially, Taylor’s method fatally undermines the notion of the maniple as a ‘cloud’ of troopers: these males have assigned areas and semi-standard spacing with clear intervals between them. Polybius – who we should stress describes normal spacing on this military which he was an eyewitness to (18.30.6-8) – is just not making it up. As an alternative, Taylor’s formation is just not a cloud however an ‘accordion’ – the boys have assigned areas during which they’re free to maneuver round. Every man thus has some flexibility of place, however not infinitely so. That accordion nature can accommodate ‘micro-pulses’ however for a macro-pulse you could have the issue above: it requires the rear ranks to again up fairly a bit.
That time about distinguishing who’s throwing the javelins in flip turns into the cornerstone of J.F. Slavik, “Pilum and Telum: The Roman Infantryman’s Fashion of Fight within the Center Republic” CJ 113 (2018) which argues that the velites use showers of their mild javelins -to allow the altering out of hastati to principes or triarii. Zhmodikov fails to differentiate the exercise of the velites and so in consequence his battles of “lengthy alternate of throwing weapons” functionally collapses into the motion not of Roman heavy infantry, however of Rome’s devoted mild infantry skirmishers, working in these intervals famous above. I don’t know that Slavik’s philological argument – that we will distinguish what’s being thrown and thus who’s throwing it by the phrases used – is hermetic, however within the circumstances the place we’re instructed explicitly what sort of troopers are doing what, his argument holds a lot better: heavy infantry appear to volley-and-charge, whereas the velites and different lights could also be skirmishing on a extra prolonged foundation within the intervals and protecting the line-changes.
That mentioned, whereas the heterodox/orthodox line on hoplites has tended to be a tough division into two camps, considering on the Roman military, has tended way more in direction of synthesis, partially as a result of the person questions (function of the pilum, the extent of skirmishing, the presence of ‘pulses,’ the rigidity of the formation) will not be handled as forming a coherent orthodox/heterodox, however slightly ‘sliding’ values able to shifting independently. You’ll be able to see this usually remedies, e.g. Ok.H. Milne, Contained in the Roman Legions (2024), which clearly asserts a volley-and-charge mannequin of pilum utilization (163) and a transparent sense of a “static entrance line” implying a daily formation (159, 162) with assigned locations (166) however frequent micro-pulses (164, 167), however no macro-pulses aside from the altering out of strains (167), with most preventing performed with swords, not pila and supporting missiles to cowl these actions by velites, not heavy infantry (168). It’s a blended place. In some unspecified time in the future it’s onerous to say if that’s both a really softened model of volley-and-charge or a softened model of Goldsworthy-Sabin-Zhmodikov, as a result of we’ve roughly met within the center.
So What of Battle Pulses?
So I don’t suppose the scholarship at current requires me to undertake the whole Goldsworthy-Sabin-Zhmodikov mannequin. And, as it’s clear, I don’t completely undertake that mannequin, although I don’t suppose every thing about it’s incorrect both.
Specifically, I don’t suppose macro-pulses, as I’ve outlined them, have been frequent, as distinct from the ‘micro-pulse,’ which I believe will need to have been constantly occurring, the place the strains stay loosely ‘involved’ (inside perhaps just a few yards of measure) or the ‘line change’ (from hastati to principes to triarii), most likely lined not by pila however by velites throwing their hastae velitares.
Now I’m not going to breed Koon’s ebook going within the different route in a weblog publish – and in any case, one of many authors above is already engaged on a monograph on Roman ways which I shall not spoil right here – however I need to give just a few data-points as to why I lean this fashion.
The primary is the soldier’s oath Livy reviews earlier than Cannae (Livy 22.38.4), “that they’d not go away nor drop again from their posts [ex ordine] neither for flight or concern, except to choose up or fetch a weapon, or to strike an enemy or to avoid wasting a citizen.” The phrase ordo in that sentence (ex ordine) means a row, a line, a collection, a rank, an association of issues, however it isn’t a unit and it’s definitely not a ‘cloud.’ It’s an assigned place that the soldier is certain to. The oath, which Livy represents as customary and common, is senseless except these troopers have an assigned place of their unit to which they’ll swear to not depart nor even to shrink again from (non…recessuros, “to not withdraw from, shrink again from, fall again from, give floor”).
In the meantime, now we have lots of proof, I’d argue, as to the volley-and-charge nature of pilum use. We get strains like, “When he [the Roman commander] was main the men-formed-up from the camp, scarcely earlier than they cleared the rampart, the Romans threw their pila. The Spaniards ducked down in opposition to the javelins thrown by the enemies, then rose themselves to throw [their own] which when the Romans, clustered collectively as they’re accustomed, had obtained with shields densely packed, then, with foot in opposition to foot and swords drawn, the matter was begun” (Livy 28.2.5-6), which is only a very clear assertion of a volley-and-charge motion, the throwing of pila by the Romans within the good (coniecerunt, ‘good’ that means ‘accomplished’) tense: it occurred (as soon as) after which stopped. Additional examples of volley-and-charge in Livy will not be onerous to come back by. Heck, Tacitus has a Roman common lay out the sequence in an order to his males: “with pila having been thrown then with shields and swords proceed the butchery and slaughter” (Tac. Ann. 14.37).
Most placing are the incidents the place the Romans don’t throw their pila in any respect. Livy, for example, has one common, the dictator Aullus Cornelius Cossus, inform his males to drop their pila after which notice that the enemy (the Volsci who may have fought in the identical method because the Romans), “once they shall have thrown their missiles in useless” should come to shut quarters the place he expects the Roman line will triumph (Livy 6.12.8-9). Conversely, Q. Pubilius Philo’s troops are so keen on the assault that they drop their pila to interact instantly with swords (Livy 9.13.2, cf. additionally 7.16.5-6, this occurs greater than as soon as). Likewise, Julius Caesar reviews in a single battle that, “Thus our males, the sign having been given sharply made an assault on the enemies they usually charged the enemies so all of a sudden and quickly {that a} area for throwing pila on the enemy was not given. So throwing away their pila, at close-quarters they fought with gladii” (Caes. BGall. 1.52.3-4). It occurs in Sallust too (Sall. Cat. 61.2).
If these guys suppose they’re commonly going to again off out of close-combat to throw javelins for a bit, why do they drop their javelins (pila) the second they arrive to shut quarters? Absolutely, if having a ‘macro-lull’ was regular, they’d need to save these weapons – at the very least within the again ranks – to be obtainable in that occasion. As an alternative, the expectation is clearly not that the unit will again off after it has engaged nor that males within the rear ranks are throwing pila over the heads of the boys in entrance of them (the hazard of which is famous in some historical sources, e.g. Onasander 17).
Now for the person within the entrance the reply is fairly apparent that pila are fairly heavy and you may’t sword-fight whereas carrying them and a defend and they also must go if youa re coming to shut contact. However notice that these strains don’t say “after which the entrance rank dropped their pila” however slightly clearly complete models do. Which actually solely is smart if these fellows think about that after they’re going into contact, they aren’t going to break contact for extra missile-throwing or simply to take a seat outdoors of contact.
We’d additionally take into account what we learn about Pydna. Now this depends a good bit on Plutarch and Plutarch is usually not the most effective supply on battles, however on Pydna he’s working from some recognized sources (Scipio Nasica Corculum’s writings and sure the account of Polybius) and his vignettes are instructive. By the point the final, Lucius Aemilius Paullus is on the sphere – this was, you’ll recall, an unplanned engagement – the armies are already to shut fight (Plut. Aem. 18.4) and we’re given a extremely bodily description that the sarisae of the Macedonians have been fastened within the shields of the Romans (19.1) so we all know he intends us to grasp these models are very a lot involved (although we’d say that whereas the Macedonians are in measure, the Romans will not be). Definitely nobody has backed out of contact.
Then we get two fascinating passages which I believe we’d say are one thing like micro-pulses: a Paelignian chucks his unit’s normal into the enemy to compel them to make a push (20.1-5) and after taking heavy losses, they’re pushed again however evidently nonetheless to some extent involved (maybe pursued) as a result of – as Michael Taylor notes in his reconstruction of the battle – they proceed to carry up the Macedonian agema which might in any other case flank the legion. In the meantime we additionally get Marcus Cato (son of Cato the Elder), who loses his sword and has to assemble up his buddies to push ahead to retrieve it (21.1-5). In each circumstances these are models that now we have to grasp are involved, not again at javelin attain, the place a person is rallying males to push ahead in an effort to drive the enemy again: Marcus Cato’s effort succeeds, whereas the Paelignians are thrown again (however purchase important time for the principle Roman drive). Each of those occasions must contain models which can be outdoors of measure, however which don’t appear – notice the above line about pikes touching Roman shields – to be absolutely out of contact.
The battle is gained, as Livy (44.41.6-9) and Plutarch (20.7-10) each notice, by having the Roman maniples interact individually, exploiting disruptions within the phalanx because it superior. What I discover placing right here is that our sources – each counting on the (misplaced) Polybian account of the battle – evidently suppose that this ‘interact at discretion’ order wanted to be given as an order (Plut. Aem. 20.7-9); dropping nicely again out of contact was evidently not a factor models usually weren’t presupposed to do on their very own. If partaking at discretion like this was the usual means of preventing, there could be no level in Plutarch having Aemilius order it, or Livy noting the bizarre nature of many separate engagements.
We will distinction what we’re instructed concerning the Battle of Zama, which supplies us a really clear macro-scale battle lull, albeit an uncommon one (Polyb. 15.13-14). Each armies are drawn up (after Roman style) in a number of battle strains; the primary strains of the 2 armies, the Carthaginian mercenaries and the Roman hastati interact in a fierce close-combat combat, however separation doesn’t happen on account of a macro-battle-pulse, it happens as a result of the mercenary line collapses after the failure of the Carthaginian second line to maneuver as much as assist it (Polyb. 15.13.3-4; the impression is psychological collapse, as Polybius is noting the cheering and encouragement of the so-far completely unengaged Roman second line as decisive). The mercenaries collapse into the principle Carthaginian line, which doesn’t admit them, resulting in a mercenary-on-Carthaginian engagement during which the fleeing mercenaries are slaughtered by their employers (Polyb. 13.5-6), which in flip now leaves the sphere of gore and wreckage between the Romans and their enemies (Polyb. 14.1-2). Scipio doesn’t need to advance over that so – and that is the factor – “recalling these nonetheless pursuing of the hastati by trumpet” [emphasis mine] Scipio reforms his ranks (Polyb. 14.4).
What is important to me right here is that the disengagement of the hastati is just not voluntary or computerized or pure, however actually requires a trumpet sign: Scipio has to order an army-wide ‘pause’ as a way to reorganize his models (actually, he’s ordering the ‘change out’ of the hastati as a solution to halt their pursuit), which he can do partially as a result of the peculiar scenario the place Hannibal (himself seemingly mimicking Roman ways he has by this level a lot expertise with) has not but dedicated his major line of infantry. This thus isn’t an natural ‘macro-lull’ a lot as it’s each armies trying to the basic Roman hastati to principes line change, with the Romans doing it extra efficiently as a result of their fussy tactical system creates lanes, whereas Hannibal wants his mercenaries to run all the way in which round his second (unbroken) line to get off of the sphere.
I believe this episode also needs to give us some significant pause when making an attempt to use Roman tactical considering outdoors of Roman contexts. The Roman system of sustaining a number of full strains of heavy infantry, one involved initially and two out of contact is, if not distinctive, definitely uncommon. Likewise, a formation with large, comparatively common intervals to allow the entrance battle line to be ‘modified out’ in a daily style is once more, if not distinctive, extremely uncommon. Efforts to imitate that flexibility with out the identical advanced and weird tactical system typically went badly, as with Hannibal’s mercenaries at Zama or, famously, the French tendencies at Agincourt, the place a sophisticated cavalry drive disrupted the 2 major strains of infantry assault as they superior after which these strains, with no solution to interchange, stacked up on one another to their break.
However it is usually indicative of how uncommon a ‘macro-lull’ was: this one solely occurs as a result of Scipio Africanus provides an order to recall his entrance line because the enemy’s entrance ranks have been breaking. As soon as once more, the explanation the armies find yourself separated after a ‘pulse’ of violence is just not as a result of that was the traditional means these armies fought however as a result of one common had particularly and considerably unusually ordered it.
The opposite instance of a large-scale macro-lull is equally instructive: Appian BC 3.68. Appian is describing an engagement between two veteran Roman legions on the Discussion board Gallorum (43 BC). Studying the passage, I believe it’s apparent we should always not take the engagement as something like typical: they combat in silence, no battle cries but in addition cries or shouts at the same time as males have been wounded and killed. Every man who falls is immediately changed, each blow was supposedly on track. And on this context of a literary description of inhuman mechanical precision in battle, we’re instructed “once they have been overcome by fatigue they drew other than one another for a short area to take breath, as in gymnastic video games, after which rushed once more to the encounter.” Instantly after that, we’re instructed the opposite troopers current have been taken by amazement on the sight and sound of it. It’s a description that’s clearly closely embroidered, a couple of battle the place Appian is writing almost two centuries after the very fact, about a military that’s supposed to look superhuman in its actions by the motif of presenting the troopers as treating the battle like gymnastic video games. I don’t suppose we will draw safe conclusions about precise battlefield follow from such a passage alone.
After this, I ought to notice, we swiftly start operating out of examples of clear ‘macro-lulls’ in Roman battles. Loads of models being ‘pushed’ (mentioned beneath) or collapsing underneath stress or armies being flanked experiencing crowd collapse underneath steady stress (e.g. Cannae), however nearly no examples of models partaking after which backing off after which shifting again to re-engage.
The Roman Face of Battle And Implications for Hoplites
Summing all of this up, what do I believe a Roman maniple partaking in pitched battle fight in opposition to heavy infantry seems to be like, given the proof?
The assault begins with the volley of pila and it positive looks like often any pila not thrown at this level are discarded, given how typically we hear of pila being dropped with out being thrown. We’ve already mentioned the weapon and its efficiency and so needn’t belabor the purpose right here.
The hastati comply with this with a cost to contact with swords. A number of issues might occur at this level. One aspect might collapse, resulting in rout and slaughter, after all. Alternately, each side may stand agency: the Romans are closely armored and have large shields and plenty of of their opponents have large shields (if usually lighter armor) too, so lots of strikes are going to not join, or merely graze targets. Our historical sources assume numerous non-lethal, non-disabling wounding occurring in these battles and we must imagine them, given shields, armor, and motion. If each side keep agency then after just a few blows we’d anticipate them to ‘accordion’ out to measure as males refuse to remain inside the ‘killing zone’ just a few toes large operating alongside the road, a ‘micro-lull’ during which the models are nonetheless involved, however a lot of their entrance strains will not be in measure.
On both aspect, the troopers now want to maneuver as much as advance into measure as a way to strike, however on this mannequin they’ll achieve this with only a step or two. As a result of this can be a formation with a daily order, the boys within the entrance can’t merely drop again for concern – recall, they’ve sworn not to take action – and the eyes of their buddies are upon them, which is a type of issues that may get males to combat once they may in any other case not, although one imagines lots of the blows are very tentative and a excessive proportion of the full time right here is spent watching and ready. Sabin is true about that: it principally have to be given the comparatively low casualties in these durations and the truth that they may stretch on for a lot of minutes even to an hour or extra in some circumstances.
The lads within the entrance are being cheered on by their fellows behind them and at the very least within the case of the Romans additionally urged ahead by their centurions and it’s this context the place you get the micro-pulses: people or extra doubtless teams of males push ahead into measure for a concerted ‘push’ on the enemy line. They’re not actually shoving, after all, however merely shifting aggressively into measure to assault – within the case of the Romans they’ve to maneuver nicely into measure as a result of they’ve swords and never spears, so they’re counting on their heavy armor and large defend to soak up a strike from the enemy earlier than they’ll reply. However, as soon as they get by that vary, they’re considerably extra deadly, higher capable of strike over or underneath an enemy’s defend and pierce armor. It’s a ‘excessive danger, excessive lethality’ tactical package deal that the Roman soldier carries, balanced along with his heavier-than-typical armor and defend.
Now the enemy can do two issues: they’ll maintain agency in opposition to this ‘push’ or – seeing buddies fall and feeling the hazard – they’ll push again out of measure on their aspect, backing as much as get area. This isn’t a rout but, cohesion is just not damaged, they’re simply going to again up into the empty area between them and the subsequent man behind them and that man will then again up too to protect area because the formation accordions in from the entrance, then accordions out once more on the again. This most likely isn’t an enormous motion – it doesn’t should be. A fast shuffle of a yard or two is sufficient to clear nicely out of measure. At which level the Romans can press once more or cease at measure to stabilize.
Now what typically occurred, what Hannibal is relying on at Cannae, is that this course of goes to repeat time and again, steadily pushing a line backwards with out breaking it. The Roman, in any case, has the shorter vary weapon – he should, on some stage, advance or he has to endure ‘potshots’ from longer spears endlessly. And he can advance, trusting his massive defend and heavy armor to soak up a blow or two from his enemy whereas he pushes into his personal, shorter however extra deadly measure. So when the enemy backs up, the Romans rapidly – maybe instantly – push proper again into measure. A number of extra foes fall, the enemy backs up once more. In any case, his enemy lacks that heavy armor and large defend to be so assured in very shut quarters and so will need to transfer away from the Roman along with his lethal sword, again to spear’s attain. As long as cohesion holds, every localized ‘push’ is probably solely gaining just a few meters and neither aspect is breaking contact, however the line is bending and shifting. Roman maniples can adapt nicely to that shifting line; the sarisa-phalanx can’t (thus Pydna).
On this type of backwards and forwards, I believe we have to assume that wounded males (or totally exhausted ones) can drop again by the ranks, however there’s clearly some disgrace in so doing, at the very least for the Romans (keep in mind that oath). However there’s loads of area with a Roman file width of c. 135cm. Heck, even at a conjectured hoplite phalanx’s 90cm, a damage man might squeeze again – or be pulled again – by his comrades as long as the formation is hovering on the fringe of measure slightly than proper up on the enemy. Biking the entrance rank appears to have by no means been systematized, nonetheless, so I think the expectation is that many males within the entrance ranks will stay there by the entire combat in the event that they’re not wounded.
As a result of the road’s motion ahead and again is pushed principally by psychology, it’s a seen indicator of the extra assured aspect – the aspect with confidence is pushing into measure, their opponents backing out. For a lot of armies utilizing contact weapons, there’s not a lot a common can do at this stage even when they see that their line is getting the worst of it, however Roman armies are unusually advanced and so the Roman common has an possibility right here if issues don’t appear to be going nicely: he can sound that trumpet to recall the hastati. What I think occurs right here is that the boys on the entrance are going to – nonetheless going through the enemy with shields up – rapidly shuffle backwards (getting out of measure and shifting to exit contact) whereas the velites (current within the gaps of the formation) bathe javelins to offer their opponents pause after which everybody breaks for the rear, passing by the intervals of the subsequent line. The enemy can’t cost after them or they’ll run pell-mell into the well-ordered maniples of the principes and be butchered. Absolutely this will need to have entailed the lack of among the hastati, however not many, I’d think about, with the velites protecting (and the velites, very evenly geared up, can simply flee an enemy’s heavy battle line).
The centurions rally the hastati within the security of the area behind the principes, who now advance and the cycle repeats.
So micro-pulses however not macro-pulses: the strains as soon as involved don’t break that ‘unfastened’ contact besides to flee, however they do ‘push’ and whereas there is no such thing as a common pause in preventing, individually troopers will not be at all times swinging or being swung at.
What may that imply for a Greek hoplite phalanx? Properly fairly just a few of those parts should considerably drop away. Whereas the Greeks definitely have mild infantry, as we’ve mentioned they don’t have built-in mild infantry, nor the retreat lanes or tactical flexibility to make use of them in the way in which the Romans do; Greeks will not be Romans. Equally, whereas the phalanx has a bunch of organizational models, it doesn’t have lots of maneuver models: the entire formation is meant to maneuver collectively. So the flexibility to keep up cohesion shifting out and in of contact goes to be considerably much less. And there’s no solution to change out total battle strains, each as a result of the phalanx is just not constructed to take action and likewise as a result of there is no such thing as a second battle line ready to rotate in any case.
However the different parts, I believe, largely stay. No volley of pila (at the very least, not after the Archaic, however we should assume that earlier Archaic throwing spear fills an analogous function to a pilum, a pre-charge volley weapon), however the hoplites cost to contact (as famous final time, both to measure or to affect). However they don’t begin shoving, as a substitute accordioning again out after which, as above, the micro-pulses: localized ‘pushes’ in sections of the road. In some circumstances, you may get the ‘pushing’ impact we see the Romans obtain though it’s notable to me that it looks like hoplite armies obtain this impact much less (although definitely not by no means!) and I think it’s because everyone seems to be working with a spear’s attain and thus a spear’s measure, so nobody aspect is compelled (because the Romans are) to advance impetuously by an opponent’s measure, neither is one aspect (as Macedonians may) capable of relentlessly push an enemy again from past their measure. However I don’t suppose the strains regularly disengaged within the Classical interval, as a result of we’re not instructed that they achieve this in any supply I can consider and since the phalanx could be even much less able to doing a ‘macro-lull‘ than a Roman legion and it looks like the Roman legions nearly by no means did them both.
The consequence of this mannequin – micro-pulses however no macro-lulls – is to a level to revive the function of heavy infantry as ‘shock’ based mostly contact troops. These males – and I believe that is true of hoplites as nicely – combat in formation, with assigned positions (or one thing very near it) that they’re anticipated to keep up for so long as they’re ready. As soon as they advance into contact, they don’t anticipate to interrupt contact till one aspect has gained or misplaced the combat in that a part of the road. However they don’t keep completely in measure swinging doubtlessly deadly blows for an hour straight. As an alternative we’d think about an open area, roughly the width of measure (so a few meters), with males lunging or advancing ahead to strike after which backing out. From time to time a concerted group of males will push into measure collectively. And typically their aggression causes the enemy to again up, resulting in the ‘pushing’ impact we’re instructed about – which occurs with no shoving.
However what they aren’t doing is backing out to return to skirmishing. The explanation so many javelin-wielding line infantry (archaic hoplites, Roman heavy infantry, Iberian and Celtiberian infantry) carry simply one or two javelins is that they anticipate to hurl these instantly earlier than contact to accentuate the drive of their onset after which not do any extra throwing. If these models break contact, it’s as a result of they’re routing or – within the Roman case solely – as a result of they’ve been recalled to reform behind the subsequent line of heavy infantry. However heavy contact infantry will not be skirmishers and so we should always not attempt to extrapolate their habits completely from watching the preventing of Dani skirmishers in Papua New Guinea. Our sources resound with assertions and descriptions that heavy infantry labored in another way on the battlefield than mild infantry and that the 2 sorts weren’t interchangeable.
Hopefully that each one clarifies my views on ‘pulses’ and ‘lulls.’ Micro-pulses? Sure. Macro-lulls? Solely very hardly ever, in uncommon circumstances.
Now as I write this, I get able to fly out to attend the 2025 Prancing Pony Podcast Moot to ship a keynote on the historic grounding of Tolkien’s view of struggle. Subsequent week can be the week of Christmas. So there will probably be no publish subsequent week (the twenty sixth), so we’ll be wrapping up our have a look at hoplites within the New Yr.
