In 2004, John Conmeans and Alexander Soifer, each working on mathematics at Princeton University, submitted to the American Mathematical Monthly what they believed was “a brand new world report within the number of phrases in a [math] paper.”
Soifer explains: “On April 28, 2004 … I submitted our paper that included simply two phrases, ‘n2 + 2 can’ and our two drawings. [See one of them above.]” The story then continues: “The American Mathematical Monthly was surprised, and didn’t know what to do about our new world report of a 2‑phrase article. Two days later, on April 30, 2004, the Editorial Assistant Mrs. Margaret Combs acknowledged the receipt of the paper”:
The Monthly publishes exposition of mathematics at many levels, and it contains articles each lengthy and brief. Your article, however, is a bit too brief to be an excellent Monthly article… A line or two of explanation would actually assist.
Soifer writers: “The identical day on the cofpayment hour I requested John [Conway], ‘What do you assume?’ His reply was concise, ‘Don’t surrender too easily.’ Accordingly, I replied [to] The Monthly the identical day”:
I respectfully disagree {that a} brief paper on the whole—and this paper specifically—merely resulting from its measurement should be “a bit too brief to be a good Monthly article.” Is there a connection between quantity and quality?… We have now posed a wonderful (in our opinion) open problem and reported two distinct “behold-style” proofs of our advance on this problem. What else is there to clarify?
Soifer provides: “The Monthly, apparently felt outgunned, for on Might 4, 2004, the reply got here from The Monthly’s prime gun, Editor-in-Chief Bruce Palka”:
The Monthly publishes two kinds of papers: “articles,” that are substantive expository papers ranging in size from about six to twenty-five pages, and “notes,” that are briefer, frequently somewhat extra technical items (typically within the one-to-five web page vary). I can ship your paper to the notes editor if you want, however I count on that he’ll not be interested in it both due to its size and lack of any substantial accompanying textual content. The standard means during which we use such brief papers today is as “boxed filler” on pages that would otherclever contain quite a lot of the clean area that publishers abhor. For those who’d enable us to make use of your paper in that means, I’d be happy to publish it.
Soifer concludes: “John Conmeans and I settle fored the ‘filler’, and within the January 2005 challenge our paper was published.” Victory!
Get extra of the againstory right here.
Related Content:
The Briefest-Recognized Paper Published in a Serious Math Journal: Two Succinct Sentences
John Nash’s Tremendous Brief PhD Thesis: 26 Pages & Two Citations
