This week, by order of the ACOUP Senate, we’re speaking in regards to the Late Bronze Age Collapse (generally abbreviated ‘LBAC’), the surprising collapse of the Late Bronze Age state system throughout the Jap Mediterranean and Center East through the twelfth century (that’s, the 1100s) BC. Within the broader Mediterranean world, the Late Bronze Age Collapse is the occasion that in all probability comes closest to a real ‘finish of civilization’ occasion – meaningfully extra extreme than the collapse of the Roman Empire within the West (though as we’ll see LBAC can also be not as ‘whole’ of a collapse as was generally supposed).
That is going to be, by our requirements right here, one thing of a short overview, roughly the equal to the lecture I give to my college students once we cowl this era (with a bit extra element, as a result of textual content is extra compressed). A full ‘deep dive’ of all the debates and open questions of this era would little doubt run fairly just a few posts and extra importantly actually should be written by specialists within the bronze age. That is additionally a very archaeologically pushed matter, which makes it extra delicate than most to new proof – archaeological web site work, but in addition epigraphic proof (totally on clay tablets) – that may change our understanding of occasions. As we’ll see, our understanding has modified a good bit.
So what we’ll do is run by means of what we find out about what occurred within the collapse (which is essentially the most seen a part of it) after which we’ll loop again to the query of causes (which stay considerably unsure) after which lastly take a look at the long-term impacts of the collapse, that are appreciable.
However first, as at all times, for those who like what you’re studying right here, please share it; for those who actually prefer it, you may help me on Patreon; members on the Patres et Matres Conscripti stage get to vote on the matters for post-series like this one! In order for you updates every time a brand new put up seems or wish to hear my extra bite-sized musings on historical past, safety affairs and present occasions, you may observe me on Bluesky (@bretdevereaux.bsky.social). I’m additionally lively on Threads (bretdevereaux) and keep a de minimis presence on Twitter (@bretdevereaux).
The (Partial?) Collapse
We have to be clear, to start with, that whereas we’ve got scattered fragments of epigraphic proof (that’s, inscriptions), nearly all of our proof for the Late Bronze Age Collapse is archaeological. With out archaeology, we’d stay largely at midnight about this occasion. However archaeological proof additionally brings with it challenges: it will possibly inform you what is occurring (generally) however usually not why and relationship with precision will be difficult. Most of what we’re monitoring in understanding LBAC is web site destruction, recognized by the demolition of key buildings or ‘destruction layers’ (usually a skinny layer of ash or rubble indicating the location was burned or demolished), however relationship these exactly will be troublesome and there are at all times challenges of interpretation.
With that mentioned, the Late Bronze Age Collapse is a sequence of web site destructions seen archaeologically from c. 1220 BC to c. 1170 BC, that are related to the collapse or extreme decline of the most important states of the area (the Jap Mediterranean and Center East). We typically conceptualize these destrictions as a ‘wave’ transferring in sequence starting within the Aegean, transferring over Anatolia, sweeping down the Levant and arriving in Egypt however in lots of instances my sense is the chronology is extra complicated than that. Many websites within the path of this ‘wave’ weren’t destroyed, with some declining slowly and others declining not a lot in any respect; different websites (I bear in mind Tiryns) see the destruction of their political middle however the decline of the city settlement round it occurs slowly or later.
First, we should set the stage of the Late Bronze Age. What actually marks out the Late Bronze Age (c. 1500 BC to c. 1200 BC) from earlier durations is that the rising state programs in Mesopotamia, Syria, Anatolia and Egypt had expanded to the purpose of coming fairly totally into contact with one another, with a major diploma of diplomatic, financial and cultural interconnectedness, to the purpose that we generally seek advice from the ‘Late Bronze Age Live performance of Powers’ (evoking nineteenth century European steadiness of energy politics) when speaking informally about them.
Now I ought to warning, we regularly present these good neat maps of the Late Bronze Age powers (they usually’re helpful to a level) however the borders of those states had been fairly fuzzy – their outer ‘possessions’ had been usually tributaries below the rule of native kings which could be weakly hooked up to the imperial middle. Nonetheless, going from East to West: southern Mesopotamia was dominated by the ‘Center Babylonian’ Empire, dominated by the Kassite dynasty (the Kassites being an ethnic group who had taken energy round 1530 BC) whereas northern Mesopotamia was dominated by the Center Assyrian Empire (from about c. 1350 BC). Anatolia and the Northern Levant was managed by the multi-ethnic Hittite Empire, which appears to have sparred often with the New Kingdom of Egypt which managed Egypt and the southern Levant. Mainly all of those powers had much less settled, usually pastoral peoples of their hinterlands which introduced on-going safety challenges for them.
These bigger imperial states had been extra economically complicated as nicely. Specifically, their massive armies required vital quantity of bronze which – as a result of its core elements of tin and copper successfully by no means happen in the identical place – demanded substantial long-distance commerce, although commerce was hardly solely in copper and tin, but in addition included different excessive worth items and even (the place possible) bulk staples. So whereas these powers clashed often, on the elite stage (if not on the stage of the subsistence financial system) they had been additionally reliant on one another to a point.
Lastly, on the fringe of this state system is the Mediterranean and particularly the Aegean. Within the Aegean – in Greece and Crete particularly – we see successfully miniature variations of those state constructions, full with (by Close to Jap Requirements) itty-bitty palaces (the Minoan city facilities on Crete had come below Mycenean (=Greek) rule in c. 1450, the palaces there largely deserted). Cyprus shifted between being nominally subordinate to both the Hitties of the Egyptians however appears to have largely run its personal affairs and was built-in by means of commerce into the state system.
As famous above, LBAC begins maybe as early as 1220 or so, and what we see in very tough sequence is as follows.
So far as I do know, we nonetheless typically assume the earliest rumblings are instability within the Mycenean Greek palace states. Issues had been unstable on this space for just a few a long time and we’ve got some scattered destructions (Thebes) and intensified fortifications round 1250, suggesting issues weren’t going nice in Greece. Then from c. 1200 to c. 1180 we see the destruction or collapse of principally all the palace facilities in Greece. In some instances the city core continues for some time, in different instances it doesn’t – in a lot of instances, as soon as the location is deserted, it’s not reinhabited (e.g. Mycenae itself, the biggest of the palace facilities).
As we’ll see under, the affect in Greece is larger than principally anyplace else as a result of the collapse of the LBAC is extra extreme in Greece than principally anyplace else.
Meanwhite, the Hittite Empire was itself not in good condition when this began. So far as we all know, the Hittites had been very a lot on the ‘again foot’ within the late 1200s, pressured by the Assyrians and Egypt and so probably already brief on sources when their neighbors to the West started imploding. So far as I do know, exact dates are onerous to nail down for this, however the Hittite Empire within the early 1100s comes aside below stress and by 1170 or so it’s gone. That collapse of imperial energy is matched by a major variety of web site destructions throughout Anatolia, together with the Hittite capital at Hattusas and the big settlement at fashionable Hisarlik, now pretty securely recognized as historical Troy. Some (like Troy) had been rebuilt, others (like Hattusas) weren’t, however centralized Hittite energy was gone and there’s a marked discount in urbanization and doubtless inhabitants.
Transferring into the Northern Levant, Syria and Northern Mesopotamia, we see Assyrian energy – which had been advancing earlier than, you’ll recall – contract sharply alongside extra web site destructions, although once more chronology is difficult. One of many key websites right here is Ugarit, a serious Bronze Age Levantine coastal metropolis which was destroyed c. 1190 – earlier than the final of the Mycenean palaces (however after the primary of them). Town’s destruction in fireplace preserved clay tablets with diplomatic messages from the native king of Ugarit (a Hittite vassal) frantically writing to his Hittite superiors for reinforcements within the face of great (however frustratingly unnamed) threats previous to the destruction of the town.
That mentioned, destruction within the Fertile Crescent could be very uneven. The Center Assyrian Empire contracts, however doesn’t collapse, whereas the Kassite Dynasty in Babylon clearly suffers some decline, however largely stabilizes by the 1160s earlier than being run over by the Elamites within the 1150s. Website destrictions within the Levant are uneven and a few key Bronze Age facilities like Sidon and Byblos weren’t destroyed and remained main facilities into the Iron Age. My understanding is that whereas there was vital decline within the southern Levant, it’s onerous to pin any particular large-scale web site destruction to the 1220-1170 interval.
Lastly we attain Egypt in a interval we seek advice from because the ‘New Kingdom’ (1570-1069); we will hint politics extra clearly right here as a result of surviving Egyptian inscriptions. Egypt was additionally in a weakened place going into this disaster, going through stress from Libyan raiders coming overland from the West and in addition some inside instability. In c. 1188, civil struggle broke out because the final queen of the reigning nineteenth dynasty was unable to retain management, resulting in revolt and the seizure of energy by Setnakhte and the twentieth dynasty; his son Ramesses III took energy in c. 1185. Issues didn’t get simpler from there as we hear stories of renewed Libyan incursions in c. 1180 (coming from the west) adopted nearly instantly by an invasion by the ‘sea peoples’ (see under) who had been evidently fended off in a minimum of two main battles, the Battle of the Delta (c. 1179ish?) and the Battle of Djahy (c. 1178ish?).
Egypt holds collectively, however there’s a good bit of proof financial pressure (doubtless local weather primarily based, see under) and the power of Egypt to undertaking energy outdoors of Egypt appears largely spent by the top of the reign of Ramesses III; his successors don’t seem to have been in a position to proper the ship and Egyptian energy continued to fragment and decline, with the dynasty stumbling on till it collapsed in 1077 resulting in the Third Intermediate Interval (‘Intermediate Intervals’ are the time period for durations of fragmentation inside Egypt).
I ought to notice on this overview that our understanding of this sequence of collapses and declines has modified considerably. The concept of the Late Bronze Age Collapse has been round because the early 1800s when historians first observed that the top of the Greek ‘Age of Heroes’ (linked by them to the Fall of Troy, which the (Classical) Greeks believed occurred in 1184) appeared to map neatly on to the failure of the Egyptian nineteenth Dynasty. As archaeologists within the later 1800s and early 1900s began truly excavating the Greek ‘Age of Heroes’ (thus discovering the (Mycenaean) Greek Late Bronze Age, which we time period the ‘Late Helladic’ interval (c. 1700-c. 1040 BC)) after which discovering web site destructions dateable inside a band of maybe 1250 to 1150 BC in Greece, Anatolia, Syria and the Levant the thought of a normal collapse round the legendary date for the Fall of Troy picked up lots of steam.
My sense of the scholarship is that this ‘civilizational collapse’ narrative has been drawn again a bit because it turns into clear that some websites weren’t destroyed and in addition that some web site destructions or abandonments occurred considerably later or sooner than the comparatively tight 1220-1170 BC timeframe that emerged for the core of the collapse. Nobody (that I do know of) is arguing there was no LBAC – there was clearly an LBAC – however the scale of the collapse stays one thing of a transferring goal as we excavate extra websites, including them to lists of websites that had been destroyed, declined or (generally seemingly randomly) had been spared.
And the checklist of websites that had been not destroyed is critical. Of notice, Athens very clearly has a Mycenaean citadel on the Acropolis (which may’t be excavated as a result of the Acropolis is in the best way, however it is vitally clearly there) however there’s no break in settlement in Athens. Already talked about, Byblos and Sidon remained very distinguished facilities earlier than and after, whereas Jerusalem and Tyre, each apparently minor settlements earlier than LBAC (and never destroyed) will change into more and more distinguished within the Iron Age Levant. Likewise the nice cities of Egypt and Mesopotamia stay, few to no web site destructions in both areas. On the similar time, many settlements that escape destruction don’t escape decline: in lots of instances these cities proceed to shrink (and a few locations that escape destruction, like Tiryns, shrink slowly moderately than vanishing unexpectedly) or develop visibly poorer in an extended course of. So the second of destruction comes with an extended ‘tail’ of decline stretching out a long time.
So to summarize, the Late Bronze Age Collapse is a sequence of web site destructions, abandonments and declines operating from roughly 1220 to roughly 1170 (although decline continues after this level) distributed fairly inconsistently by means of the interconnected Late Bronze Age Mesopotamian-and-Jap-Mediterranean world. Greece and Anatolia are severely impacted, the Levant considerably much less however nonetheless pretty strongly, whereas the states of Egypt and Mesopotamia don’t collapse however enter lengthy durations of decline.
What that description leaves out, in fact, are causes and results.
Unhealthy Theories
Whereas the ‘what’ of LBAC will be pinned down pretty conclusively with archaeology, the ‘why’ is more durable – lots of potential causes (wars, armies, civil unrest) don’t essentially depart lots of clues in our supply materials.
There are just a few theories we will largely low cost on the outset although. The older of those had been theories that assumed that the reason for a minimum of a few of the Late Bronze Age Collapse had been large-scale migrations of individuals into (moderately than inside) the settled, city zone we’ve been speaking about, specifically the thought of a ‘Dorian Invasion’ of Greece because the spark of the collapse. Proposed within the 1800s, the thought right here was that the ‘Dorians’ – the ancestors of the Greeks – would have migrated into Greece, destroying the Mycenaean cities and palaces and displacing or dominating the earlier (non-Greek) inhabitants. This notion was primarily based on combined and competing concepts inside (Classical) Greek literature: Greek authors each expressed the thought of the Greeks being autochthonous (indigenous to their territory, actually ‘[arising] on their very own from the earth’) and additionally being invaders, arriving in some unspecified time in the future forty to eighty years after the Trojan Battle (e.g. Thuc. 1.12; Hdt. 1.56-58). That concept acquired picked up by nineteenth century European students who, to be frank, usually thought uncritically when it comes to inhabitants migration and alternative, by means of an usually explicitly racist lens of ‘superior inventory’ driving out ‘inferior inventory.’ And they also imagined a ‘Dorian invasion’ of the (racially) ‘superior’ Greek-speaking Dorians driving out the pre-Greek Mycenaean inhabitants, notably within the Peloponnese.
As an apart, it’s not unusual for a single society to make the most of each legendary myths of autochthony and arrival-by-conquest, selecting whichever is extra helpful within the second, although they’re clearly, from a logical standpoint, mutually incompatible.
Archaeology has essentially undermined this concept – nuked it from orbit, actually – in two key methods. First, we’ve got Mycenaean writing, which was found in a wierd script known as Linear B (Minoan writing is Linear A). Initially unreadable to us, in 1952 Michael Ventris efficiently demonstrated that Linear B was, in truth, Greek (rendered in a special, older script) and so the Mycenaeans had been Greeks. In the meantime a variety of archaeologists and materials tradition students, as extra late Helladic and early Archaic pottery and paintings emerged, had been in a position to display there merely was no discontinuity in materials tradition. The Greeks couldn’t be arriving on the finish of the Bronze Age as a result of they had been already there and had been for hundreds of years a minimum of. Migrations inside the Jap Mediterranean may nonetheless play a job, however the concept that the collapse was attributable to the arrival of the Greeks has been decisively deserted. There was no Dorian Invasion.
The opposite trigger we will in all probability dismiss is a single, sudden pure calamity. There are two candidates right here to notice. The primary is just folks complicated the most important eruption of Thera (c. 1600) which is typically related to the decline of the Minoan Palaces (although the chronology doesn’t actually work nicely there both) with LBAC. The second is effort to attach the eruption of Hekla in Iceland with LBAC. The issue once more is that the chronology doesn’t seem to work out – estimates for the relationship of the Hekla eruption vary from 1159 to 929 with the consensus being, as I perceive it, nearer to 1000 BC. For our half, the vary doesn’t matter a lot – even that earliest 1159 date would imply that Hekla’s large eruption may hardly clarify the collapse of Mycenean palaces taking place a minimum of forty years earlier. Local weather performed a job in LBAC, however it’s not clear that volcanic local weather affect did and it is vitally clear that Hekla didn’t (although maybe it contributed to make a foul decline worse.
So no ‘Dorian Invasions’ and no volcanoes, so what did trigger it?
Causes of LBAC
We’ve got no agency solutions, however a lot of believable theories and at this level my sense is that virtually everybody engaged on this era adopts some variation of ‘all the above’ from this checklist.
We are able to begin with local weather. For causes there’s been various analysis into historic local weather situations and we will truly get a way of these situations to a level archaeology from issues like tree rings (the place very slender rings can point out dry years or in any other case unfavorable situations). I don’t work on historic local weather, however my understanding is there’s various compelling proof that interval of LBAC, particularly the 1190s, was unusually dry within the Jap Mediterranean, which might have prompted lowered agricultural output (crop failures). Apparently, this is able to be most instantly impactful in areas engaged primarily in rainfall agriculture (Greece, Anatolia, the Levant) and fewer impactful in areas engaged extra in irrigation agriculture (Egypt, Mesopotamia). And, oh look, the areas the place LBAC was extra extreme are within the rainfall zone and the areas the place it was much less extreme are within the irrigation zone.
Crop failures might have been notably politically unstable due to the construction and values of the type of Close to Jap states (to incorporate Anatolia and Greece right here) that we’re coping with. We haven’t mentioned early bronze age states very a lot however the proof we’ve got means that these had been considerably centralized states, with lots – not all, however lots – of the sources transferring by means of both state (learn: royal) constructions or by means of temple establishments which may as nicely have been state constructions. Which is to say these are societies the place the king and the temples (which report back to the king) personal many of the land and so harness many of the agricultural surplus by means of rents after which make use of the lion’s share of non-agricultural labor, redistributing their manufacturing. Once more, I don’t wish to overstate this – there is a ‘personal sector’ in these economies – however it appears (our proof is proscribed!) to be comparatively small.
In the meantime, the clearly attested spiritual position of the king in lots of these societies features a duty – usually the paramount duty – to take care of the great relations of the group with the gods (who present the rain and make the vegetation develop).
Repeated crop failures are thus going to be seen as an indication that the King is falling down on the job. Worse but, they’ll have come on the similar time because the King discovered himself strained to take care of his bureaucrats and troopers, as a result of the whole top-heavy royal administration this method depends on is fed off of the excess it extracts.
It’s not onerous to see how this can be a recipe for political instability if massive states do not need the sources to fall again on to answer the disaster.
To which some students have famous that the interval instantly main as much as LBAC appears to have been a interval of intensifying warfare: we hear of bigger armies working within the wars in Mesopotamia, Egypt and the Levant and we see massively larger funding in fortification within the Aegean all suggesting that the states are pouring sources into warfare. That will have left these states with fewer sources (idle labor, saved grain, money-covertable valuables or just reserves of public goodwill since lengthy years of excessive taxes in lengthy wars tends to tire folks out) with which to confront a sudden wave of mixed political unrest and meals scarcity.
What is evident is that when the collapse began, it was contagious, doubtless for 2 causes: first that collapsing areas produced invading forces and refugee flows that destabilized their neighbors and second as a result of as you’ll recall above, these states are interlinked and their rulers depend on commerce to furnish the important thing army useful resource (bronze) in addition to to amass key status items vital to take care of the loyalty of the aristocracy.
The clearest proof of this are the stories in Egyptian inscriptions of peoples grouped below the fashionable heading of ‘Sea Peoples’ as a result of they’re usually described as being ‘of the ocean’ in a method or one other. The proof right here is difficult: what we’ve got are a set of inscriptions, spanning from 1210 by means of to the mid-1100s describing preventing towards – and, this being Egyptian royal writing, invariably the victory of a Pharaoh over – a variety of invading peoples. What is difficult is these stories cowl a number of durations of preventing they usually’re utilizing Egyptian names for these folks that means we’re not at all times solely assured that we will inform who precisely the Egyptians meant to determine.
Typically, nevertheless, what we appear to be seeing is elevated stress on Egypt from c. 1205 to c. 1170 from multi-ethnic coalitions of peoples drawn from the Aegean, Anatolia and the Levant. Specifically, inscriptions from the reign of Merneptah (r. 1213-1203) report assaults by the Ekwesh (presumably an Egyptian rendering of Achaioi, ‘Achaean,’ that means Greek) together with the Lukka (an Anatolian folks), the Sherden (in all probability a Levantine folks, maybe the Philistines) and others even more durable to pin down just like the Shekelesh (extra Anatolians? Sicels? different folks on boats?). Later inscriptions from the reign of Ramesses III (r. 1185-1154) report comparatively early in his reign victories towards coalitions that embody the Denyen (presumably an Egyptian rendering of ‘Danaioi,’ that means Greek), the Sherden (once more), the Shekelesh (once more), the Peleset (Levantine folks, in all probability Philistines) and others.
The best way this proof is mostly learn – and this appears essentially the most believable clarification – is that the disruptions within the Aegean, Anatolia and Levant might have themselves produced armed mass-migrations, transferring by sea (these had been all sea-faring peoples), maybe on the lookout for secure harbor. Or maybe fairly literal bands of raiders – the collapse of state constructions in Greece and Anatolia may nicely have left lots of full-time violence-doers with out regular employment and going raiding might have been a pure recourse for some. There’s some sense in Hittite paperwork, as an example that the ‘Ahhiyawa’ (Hittite rendering for Achaioi, that means Greek) may need been an hostile neighbors to the Hittites and given how closely militarized elite Mycenaean tradition appears to have been, it wouldn’t be surprising in the event that they often went on seaborne raids (although, once more, the proof right here is very skinny).
In the meantime, whereas commerce doesn’t fully cease, it definitely appears to be lowered by the collapse of those states, presumably interrupting the availability of key items – the obvious being bronze – and any state revenues derived from taxing commerce (which they did).
Consequently the ‘consensus’ imaginative and prescient – which stays to a level conjectural, though it’s the ‘finest match’ for the proof – runs roughly like this:
- Intensifying warfare within the E. Mediterranean and Mesopotamia might have lowered the sources out there for main states to confront a disaster and maybe had been already related to some type of unrest.
- A shift to a drier local weather causes harvest failures which start to push the teetering states over the sting into collapse.
- In Greece, the palace states start to break down one after the other – in all probability from inside strains (e.g. an oppressed peasantry) moderately than exterior invasion.
- As a result of the ‘palace financial system’ was so central (and employed lots of people, together with lots of warriors), collapse inside Greece might have been contagious as raids and refugees spawned by collapsing palace programs fatally strained others.
- These collapses in flip start to disrupt commerce but in addition produce outward actions of refugees and/or raiders, which can partially be what’s being ‘remembered’ in Homer’s account of the Trojan Battle or the broader Greek mythological assumption that the Trojan Battle marks the top of the ‘Age of Heroes’ (which is how the Classical Greeks understood this era).
- That very same pressure hits the already ailing Hittite Empire, strained by wars and defeats within the Levant towards the Egyptians and Assyrians. Battered by harvest failures and rising raids (corresponding to these Ugarit is crying for assist from), Hittite energy collapses.
- The states of the Northern Levant, below stress already now lose their protector, whereas the opposite main states of the area (Egypt, Assyria, Kassite Babylon) lose a key commerce companion and a minimum of some entry to tin specifically (required for bronze).
- The ensuing financial contraction produces inside instability (Nineteenth dynasty changed by Twentieth in Egypt) and mixed with additional raiding/refugee pressures, all of those imperial powers contract into their homelands, now not in a position to undertaking energy far afield.
- In Babylon, the Kassites ore or much less stabilize by the 1160s, however in a weakened state, are overrun by the Elamites – a perpetual native menace – within the 1150s. In Egypt there’s a second of restoration and stability below Ramesses III of the brand new Twentieth Dynasty, however additional succession disputes – maybe partially motivated by unhealthy financial situations – result in energy fragmenting till central rule collapses within the early 1070s. Assyrian energy contracts again to the Assyrian homeland in Northern Mesopotamia, however the state survives, to reemerge as a staggeringly main energy within the early Iron Age.
You’ll in fact notice that we will observe all of those phases solely very imperfectly: we’re working with fragmentary letters, inscriptions which are usually unreliable and sometimes excellent archaeology that may inform us what occurred (‘this palace was burned and all the finery was dumped in a nicely’) however not why.
The Results of the Collapse
Simply because the collapse itself was uneven – some states and settlements destroyed, others largely spared – so too its results had been uneven, so we’d do a short rundown by area.
However first I wish to notice the impact the collapse has on our proof. In lots of locations, I examine it to a lightning bolt at evening that takes out the facility. Instantly earlier than the collapse, it was dim, however there was some mild: although deep previously, we’ve got massive states which are creating information and inscribing issues on stone some small portion of which survive; we will’t see anyplace close to in addition to we will over the past millennium BC, however we will see some issues. Then the collapse hits like that bolt of lightning and we all of the sudden get lots of proof without delay. Destruction layers are sometimes archaeologically wealthy (issues get deposited that wouldn’t usually) and when, as an example, somebody burns an archive stuffed with clay tablets, that fires the clay tablets in ceramic, which may survive. In the meantime it’s simpler to excavate websites that had been deserted and never re-inhabited: they in all probability don’t have main fashionable cities on them and also you don’t must excavate fastidiously by means of centuries of dense, steady habitation to get all the way down to the bronze age stage.
However then in lots of areas – particularly Greece – we’re plunged into lots of darkness. The states that had been producing written information are both a lot smaller or gone solely. Decreased on the similar time is commerce in items that we will use to see long-distance cultural connections. And in lots of instances poorer societies construct in wooden and mudbrick moderately than stone; the latter survives much better than the previous to be noticed archaeologically.
The Aegean and mainland Greece – that’s, the Mycenaean Greeks – had been evidently hit hardest by the collapse. Very like Britain when the Roman Empire collapsed within the West, being on the very fringe of the state system because it got here aside left them evidently much more remoted with a way more extreme decline. Massive-scale stone constructing successfully vanishes in Greece and received’t reappear till the Archaic interval (750-480), which in flip makes it a lot more durable to look at issues like settlement patterns through the intervening interval, generally termed the Greek Darkish Age (1100-750; many archaeologists of the interval dislike this time period for apparent causes). However from what we will see, Greece appears to largely deurbanize on this interval, though a minimum of one Mycenaean middle survives – Athens. That will in flip clarify to a point why Athens is such a large polis when it comes to its territory by the point we will see it clearly within the Archaic.
Maybe most shockingly, mainland Greece loses writing. The Mycenaean palaces had developed a syllabic script, which we name Linear B, to characterize their spoken Greek. This type of writing is solely misplaced. Within the eighth century, the Greeks will undertake a completely new script – borrowing the one the Phoenicians are utilizing – to characterize their language and we (they usually) shall be unable to learn Linear B till 1953.
The totality of the collapse of central state establishments in Mycenaean Greece might partially clarify the emergence of a political establishment as unusual because the polis. It’s clear that by means of the Greek ‘Darkish Ages’ and the next Archaic interval, although Greek communities have ‘kings’ – although known as basileis (a phrase that within the Mycenaean Linear B tablets would imply ‘village chief,’ a subordinate to the precise king within the palace, the wanax, a time period Homer makes use of for Agamemnon and Priam solely) – they lack the centralized financial engine of the palace financial system and as an alternative have a lot weaker central governing programs. It’s one thing not fairly however maybe near a ‘clear slate’ from which to develop new programs of governance that may look very completely different from what societies to their East had developed.
No different a part of the Jap Mediterranean suffers a civilizational setback fairly as intense as in Greece, however maybe essentially the most vital impact is a interval of extended political fragmentation in Anatolia and the Levant. These areas had been, over the Late Bronze Age, largely below the management of main imperial powers (Egypt, Assyria, the Hittites), however with these powers eliminated they’ve an opportunity to develop considerably independently. That interval of relative independence goes to slam shut when the Neo-Assyrian Empire – itself a continuation of the Center Assyrian Empire, recovered from LBAC – reasserts itself within the ninth century, dominating the Levant and even Egypt.
However at the moment a lot of completely different smaller societies have an opportunity to make their very own approach within the Levant, two of that are going to go away a really massive mark. Within the northern Levant, this era of fragmentation creates house for the rise of the most important Phoenician facilities – Byblos, Sidon and Tyre (of which the latter will finally change into a very powerful). As we’ve mentioned, these are going to be the start line for a wave of Phoenician colonization within the Mediterranean, as Phoenician merchants steadily knit Mediterranean commerce networks (again) collectively. They’re additionally, as famous above, utilizing their very own phonetic script, the Phoenician alphabet, which is in flip going to type the fundamental of many different regional scripts. Maybe most related for us, the Greeks will undertake and modifying the Phoenician alphabet to characterize their very own language after which peoples of pre-Roman Italy will undertake and modify that to make the Previous Italic alphabet which in flip turns into the Latin alphabet which is the alphabet wherein I’m typing proper now.
In the meantime within the southern Levant this era of fragmentation creates the house for the emergence of two small kingdoms whose persons are creating a really traditionally vital faith centered on the worship of their God Yahweh. These are, in fact, the kingdoms of Israel and Judah. We’re unusually nicely knowledgeable in regards to the historical past of those kingdoms as a result of their historical past was preserved as a part of Jewish scripture, though verifying parts of that scripture as historic reality is sort of onerous – students stay divided, as an example, in regards to the existence of an precise ‘united monarchy’ (in scripture below Saul, David and Solomon) which might have existed c. 1000 BC (against this the later break up kingdoms are attested in Assyrian information). The event of those two kingdoms – and thus the event of all the Abrahamic faiths – is tremendously influenced by this era of fragmentation. Readers who know their Kings and Chronicles might have already pieced collectively that it’s that re-expansion of Assyrian energy which can result in the destruction of the northern kingdom of Israel within the 720s, whereas the southern kingdom of Judah persists as a quasi-dependency of Assyria earlier than being dismembered and destroyed lastly by the Neo-Babylonian Empire (which replaces the Neo-Assyrian Empire, nevertheless briefly) in 597 BC.
In fact the troublesome factor in all of that is that it’s this preliminary interval, the place lots is clearly forming and brewing within the Jap Mediterranean that our proof is considerably weaker than we’d like (once more, particularly in Greece, however notice how a lot uncertainty we’ve got even within the Levant). The primary few centuries of the Iron Age, instantly following the Late Bronze Age Collapse are clearly a vital formative interval that are going to set a few of the key patterns for occasions to play out in the remainder of antiquity as ‘the curtain goes up’ because it had been and we begin with the ability to see these occasions clearly.
All that mentioned, I’ve to emphasize that is actually a very primary overview. I’m probably lacking out on a few of the newest work on this subject (as a result of I’m a late/put up Iron Age scholar) and in any case lots of this can not assist however be a reasonably primary abstract. Maybe considered one of today I can get a Late Bronze Age or early Close to Jap Iron Age specialist to guest-write one thing extra detailed on particular aspects of the collapse and its affect.
