Dany Ciara Fires Again at As I Lay Dying’s Tim Lambesis

Dany Ciara has fired again at her ex-husband, As I Lay Dying‘s Tim Lambesis, in an announcement on social media.

Lambesis shared a publish on Instagram yesterday (Dec. 28) responding to a brand new podcast episode Ciara appeared on the place she opened up on her tumultuous marriage to the singer. His assertion urged that Ciara deliberately spoke out now as a result of he is within the strategy of making an album with the brand new members of As I Lay Dying.

What Did Dany Ciara Reply to Tim Lambesis?

Shortly after Lambesis’ publish went up, Ciara shared an announcement on her personal Instagram and tagged the singer in it. She stated that her determination to talk out has nothing to do together with his profession however is as an alternative the results of him “mendacity and rewriting the story” to guard himself.

Learn the publish in full under.

Hey @timlambesis
First, the declare that you just “stayed quiet” about your private life this entire time is definitely loopy. This whole final yr, you’ve gotten publicly slandered and lied about what occurred throughout our marriage on Instagram and Fb portraying your self because the sufferer, accusing me of many unfaithful issues that straight concerned me, mendacity and rewriting the story to salvage your picture.

Second, framing my talking now as “timing,” “fixation” or “attachment” is a deflection. Attacking motive is a typical means of yours to keep away from partaking with substance. You are speaking about once I spoke and why you suppose I spoke, however you are not really addressing what I stated. Survivors of abuse don’t lose the fitting to inform the reality as a result of time has handed, as a result of the opposite particular person’s profession has momentum or as a result of it is inconvenient. Abuse does not grow to be “previous tales” as a result of the one who induced hurt needs it buried. Sorry.

This has nothing to do together with your profession, your momentum or your touring schedule. I am talking now since you refuse to cease mendacity and pretending you did not abuse me. I lastly really feel robust sufficient to inform the reality with out concern of intimidation or silencing. Framing my talking out round your Russian excursions is manipulative and it does not erase what occurred or what you probably did.

You retain saying “context issues.” On October 10 I texted you after seeing a lot of your public feedback and I referred to as you out in your lies, suggesting that we each come ahead with the reality, “I present all of the proof from my facet, you present all of the proof out of your facet.” You REFUSED. Why is that? Ought to I present the context of all the things that I talked about and all the things I did not discuss?

I didn’t “break the silence.” I spoke after a lot of your public statements about me had already been made. While you say “context issues,” you employ that phrase as a protect whereas persevering with to keep away from specifics. If context really mattered to you, you’d deal with concrete behaviors somewhat than implying my obsession, dishonesty or opportunism.

“If something unlawful had occurred, it will have been addressed by means of correct channels”? The concept one thing is not actual except it is prosecuted is loopy. Most abuse by no means goes by means of the authorized system and that does not erase it. Many survivors by no means report abuse attributable to concern, coercion, monetary management, retaliation or security issues. A scarcity of prosecution is just not proof of innocence and it isn’t a mirrored image of lived expertise.

What precisely are you referring to that’s so-called “unlawful”? The screenshots of you having possession of unlawful AI pornography together with a minor are actually on the podcast, there’s proof of the context proper there for you. Simply because it wasn’t reported and you were not prosecuted doesn’t suggest that it did not occur. The whole lot I talked about on the podcast I’ve proof for. Like I stated, I’m allowed to speak concerning the horrific shit that you just did.

It is also deeply hypocritical to counsel that my relationship historical past one way or the other discredits my credibility whereas ignoring your individual. You’re in your third marriage. You had been convicted for trying to have your first spouse killed. You cheated on and abused your second spouse. And regardless of all of that, you count on individuals to consider that any sample price scrutinizing belongs solely to me. Invoking my previous relationships is just not context. You are deflecting. And it does not negate a single factor I really stated about you.

I am conscious of the scrutiny round why I married you given your historical past. I personal my half in that. I wasn’t pondering clearly, I wasn’t healed and I made choices from a broken place. That is one thing I have been trustworthy with myself about. What I will not settle for is the concept my flaws one way or the other erase the abuse you inflicted. What’s dishonest is utilizing previous relationship to suggest that each one of my experiences should be fabricated, in exaggerated or opportunistic. A number of issues will be true on the similar time. I can acknowledge my very own patterns and nonetheless be telling the reality about what occurred in our relationship.

I’m going into nice element on the podcast about how I’ve spent the final yr reflecting on myself and my very own patterns of why I proceed to gravitate in direction of poisonous relationships, I by no means as soon as claimed I’m an ideal sufferer and I by no means as soon as claimed that I’ve not been part of that. However as soon as once more, that doesn’t negate the abuse that you just put me by means of. Minimizing me speaking about abuse you set me by means of as “noise” or to me as somebody who “hooked up” myself to you is one other pathetic try and disgrace me talking into silence.

I’m not attaching myself to you. I’m telling me story. I existed earlier than you and I exist after you. You do not get to determine once I’m allowed to talk about what occurred to me. You do not get to reframe my fact as a nuisance to your profession. Your work and music doesn’t get veto energy over my voice. I spoke truthfully about my expertise. I am not asking for permission, validation or approval. I am correcting the report and reclaiming my narrative after an excessive amount of of your public distortion and lies. I am not going to again right down to you and you are not going to disgrace me into silence.

What Did Tim Lambesis’ Assertion Say?

BREWtally Talking Podcast’s episode with Ciara went dwell yesterday. In the course of the episode, which was almost 4 hours lengthy, Ciara went into element about her relationship with the singer together with the way it started and when it took a flip for the more serious.

READ MORE: Ken Susi Opens Up on As I Lay Dying Implosion

Lambesis shared his assertion on social media a couple of hours later, writing, “previous tales resurface solely when my life and profession transfer ahead once more.” He implied that Ciara eliminated context from the tales she shared and blamed platforms for being “prepared to host one-sided tales with out accountability.”

The vocalist in contrast the state of affairs to that of artist Greg Overton, who turned fashionable after showing on Joe Rogan’s podcast after which confronted “public commentary from a former relationship” afterward.

See the total assertion under and the podcast episode with Ciara beneath.

Dany Ciara Opens Up on Marriage to Tim Lambesis