On 21 March 1776 the favored politician John Wilkes (1725-97) rose in a packed Home of Commons to talk in favour of parliamentary reform. The franchise, he argued, was hopelessly old-fashioned, with the state of illustration within the nation the identical because it had been on the time of Charles II’s loss of life in 1685. Too many seats remained in thinly populated counties, whereas rising cities had no illustration. Wilkes advocated abolishing these seats and enfranchising missed cities, stating that too many ‘helpful’ folks of the artisan class had been excluded from voting. He requested whether or not the present parliament might be mentioned really ‘to be the sense of the nation, as within the time of our forefathers’.
Wilkes’ speech, and subsequent movement for a invoice, had been lengthy trailed. On the basic election of 1774 he had been returned, together with a handful of different Members, akin to John Sawbridge, on a platform for reform. Wilkes and Sawbridge’s was an uneasy alliance, however each had signed as much as a programme agreed by the Invoice of Rights Society – a subscription society initially established to repay Wilkes’ money owed, but additionally dedicated to campaigning for reform. Initially, Wilkes delayed bringing the movement. Different points intervened. He made a spirited speech in help of Sawbridge’s transfer for shorter parliaments. He then spoke concerning the American disaster, and one other matter very near his coronary heart: his ongoing efforts to have the movement expelling him from the Home – for libel – expunged from the information. But, because the historian Peter Thomas put it in 1996, as the primary particular person to submit a movement for parliamentary reform, Wilkes secured for himself ‘a spot within the Pantheon of British Radicalism’.
As each Wilkes and his supporters anticipated, his movement proved a non-starter. The following day’s Gazetteer and New Day by day Advertiser reported that he was answered ‘in a jocular, satirical method’ by the prime minister Lord North. The topic was then quietly shelved. Seven years later, Wilkes supported Pitt the Youthful’s try to introduce an identical measure, however historians are inclined to conclude that Wilkes performed little function in subsequent reform efforts, having determined there was no progress to be made. He not often wasted his time on causes that will not profit him.
This has helped inform his popularity as somebody of distinct contradictions. He was the darling of the ‘mob’, who took nice pleasure in goading the authorities; he was additionally an institution determine – an MP, lord mayor of London, and a convivial hanger-on in aristocratic households. His private life was no completely different. The archetypal Georgian libertine, his relations with ladies had been typically unsavoury. He additionally co-authored the infamous Essay on Lady (1763), which turned Pope’s Essay on Man on its head by swapping out the vocabulary of the unique with scatological options. However he was additionally a bibliophile, proficient Latinist, and patron of the humanities.
Wilkes’ interactions together with his help base exhibit the identical contradictions. The product of a rich service provider household from London, he was educated at Leiden College, the place he rubbed shoulders with future politicians. Wilkes got here to in style consideration on account of his editorship of the North Briton, devoted to attacking George III’s favorite, the earl of Bute. The inflammatory tone of problem 45 had introduced the total power of the federal government down on the paper and, in 1763, triggered a collection of authorized actions which noticed Wilkes imprisoned within the Tower of London. Hailed as a champion of liberty on his launch, he selected exile, and was later outlawed, changing into a celeb within the course of.
On his return in 1768 Wilkes devoted himself to securing re-election for Parliament. He discovered allies throughout the Metropolis of London and a constituency in Middlesex open to returning a demagogue whose political imaginative and prescient was laden with the imagery of the revolution of 1688: liberty and property.
His effort to be returned for London was unsuccessful, however his speech is revealing. Wilkes insisted he stood earlier than them ‘a non-public man, unconnected with the Nice’ and with none occasion. His solely help, he emphasised, was ‘you: I want no different help’. In Middlesex this performed very properly with these ‘small freeholders’ – artisans and shopkeepers – who had at all times discovered him an interesting figurehead, and resulted in his election on the high of the ballot.
Wilkes was supremely competent at studying a crowd, although it may be tough to reconcile his relations together with his supporters and their relationship with him. Till his exile, he had relied on his aristocratic backers however, as John Sainsbury noticed, by 1767 he appears to have misplaced religion in them. Deserted by ‘the nice’, he seemed elsewhere. This political persona was on show throughout his March 1776 speech, on the finish of which he argued that ‘all authorities is instituted for the nice of the mass of the folks to be ruled’ and that ‘they’re the unique fountain of energy’. The road resonated each in Britain and throughout the Atlantic, the place his instance was seen keenly.
This didn’t forestall Wilkes from viewing his new associates with unease. Edmund Burke famously upbraided Wilkes for being contemptuous of his pals, specifically his backers within the company of London, whom Wilkes had been recognized to lampoon as ‘fat-headed turtle-eating aldermen’. Wilkes was mentioned to have replied: ‘Oh … I by no means giggle at my pals, however these are solely my followers.’ A lot of his middling kind supporters can also have felt a disconnect between Wilkes the scandalous, debt-ridden libertine movie star and Wilkes the champion of revolutionary rules. His standing as a figurehead representing British liberty, which was deemed below menace, was sufficient for them to miss his discreditable behaviour.
Wilkes’ instance may be transposed onto any variety of up to date politicians, desirous to current themselves as faraway from the institution. He developed a definite anti-establishment guise, complaining of the ‘nice … whom I hate and despise’. If he selected to play to the gang, although, it didn’t imply that he needed to reside within the crowd.
Â
Robin Eagles is Editor of the Home of Lords (1660-1832) on the Historical past of Parliament, and creator of Champion of English Freedom: The Lifetime of John Wilkes, MP and Lord Mayor of London (Amberley, 2024).
