“Dogtor Doolittle” Indicted: The Rise and Fall of Austin Mendoza’s Canine Coaching Scheme

A Canine’s Intuition By no means Lies

Human beings have lengthy seemed to canine as companions, protectors, and household. There’s a motive we name a canine man’s finest buddy: they sense our moods, defend our kids, and provide unconditional love. And when a canine bristles at a stranger, we regularly take it as a telling signal of that individual’s true character.

In American tradition, the lack to love canine—or worse, to hurt them—is not only uncommon; it’s unsettling. Compassion towards animals is a pure extension of our humanity. So when tales started to floor a couple of younger New Jersey man advertising and marketing himself as “Dogtor Doolittle,” yielding miracle leads to canine coaching, many canine homeowners have been desperate to consider. However behind the veneer of cute social media clips and boastful confidence, prosecutors have uncovered a darkish actuality of animal abuse, fraud, and exploitation.

The Man Behind the Persona

Austin Mendoza, 32, of Perth Amboy, New Jersey, constructed his status shortly. Starting throughout The Pandemic, Mendoza branded himself as “Dogtor Doolittle,” an expert canine coach able to curing even probably the most troublesome canine behaviors. His pitch was irresistible to determined pet dad and mom fighting aggression, nervousness, or burglary points.

On Instagram and TikTok, Mendoza’s feed was a carousel of canine obeying instructions, staged “before-and-after” transformations, and testimonials that appeared to show his strategies labored. His confidence—and typically vanity—satisfied shoppers he had authority.

His applications got here at a steep value: two – twelve week boarding packages priced between $2,500 and $10,000 per canine. For a lot of households, that was a small fortune, however one they have been keen to pay if it meant their beloved pet can be happier and higher behaved.

However prosecutors allege it was all a smokescreen. Mendoza had no certifications, no veterinary background, and no formal animal habits coaching. As an alternative, investigators say, he fabricated diagnoses, used merciless coaching strategies, was aggressive with the animals and his workers, and housed animals in appalling situations.

The Arrest

In the summertime of 2025, after years of mounting complaints, federal authorities moved in. Following a multi-agency investigation, Mendoza was arrested, booked, and charged. He has since posted bail and is awaiting a courtroom date. As a result of his shoppers and alleged victims span a number of states, the case has been taken up on the federal degree.

In line with courtroom paperwork, Mendoza faces fees together with:

• Animal Cruelty (18 U.S.C. § 48) – for the documented abuse of boarded canine.
• Wire Fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1343) – for soliciting funds beneath false pretenses by way of digital communications.
• Conspiracy to Commit Fraud (18 U.S.C. § 371)
• Misleading Enterprise Practices beneath New Jersey legislation
• Interstate Transportation of Stolen Property (18 U.S.C. § 2314) – associated to alleged extortion of animals used as leverage in disputes.

Mendoza has pleaded not responsible. And, because the justice system reminds us, he stays harmless till confirmed responsible…

A Sample of Abuse

The allegations in opposition to “Dogtor Doolittle” are each stunning and constant. 5 people—former shoppers, an worker, and a townswoman —spoke to me, and all corroborated a sample of abuse and deception. Their names have been protected the place acceptable.

The E-Collar: A Instrument of Torture

Central to Mendoza’s alleged practices was the necessary use of digital collars—or “e-collars.” Marketed as superior coaching instruments, e-collars ship an electrical shock to a canine’s neck at various intensities. Mendoza required his shoppers to buy them, insisting they have been essential to his program.

However consultants dispute that declare. Analysis persistently reveals that e-collars provide no benefit over constructive reinforcement coaching. As an alternative, they threat burns, continual stress, fear-based behaviors, and, in some instances, aggression. Humane societies worldwide have referred to as for his or her ban.

“Austin informed me he was solely utilizing the bottom setting,” one shopper defined. “However once I acquired my Shih Tzu again, he had burnt fur round his neck. He wasn’t the identical canine anymore. He seemed and acted damaged. We later came upon our canine was caged with larger, extra aggressive canine, he was most likely terrified. It got here as no shock later after we realized about Austin’s status with aggressive canine. In fact, he made no point out of this after we’d first consulted with him. He knew we have been determined and smelled our wallets. Our canine is so broken, that man had no thought what he was doing, he shouldn’t be allowed to be round animals.”

This testimony aligns with stories from different homeowners whose canine returned with burns or open wounds brought on by the units.

Testimony: Neighborhood Nightmare

“I lived close to the diabolical doggy daycare for months,” the resident recalled. “I noticed all of it. Canines have been stored in cages, typically ten or extra at a time, out within the yard or within the basement. You would typically see the cages have been stacked when the home windows have been open, and the canine can be barking relentlessly. They’d sit for hours with no water, their very own waste piling up, I’ve timestamped pictures. He had chickens operating round too, which isn’t even authorized right here. And people poor canine… I’ll always remember their cries.”

The girl supplied movies of roosters crowing at daybreak, images of canine pacing in cramped cages, and documentation of foul odors emanating from the property. For a residential zone like Perth Amboy, the spectacle was alarming; and a violation of zoning ordinances, which cap the variety of canine per residence.

Testimony: Virgil

One of many victims, referred to right here as Virgil, shared their story.

“Once I picked my canine up, he wasn’t the identical. He had misplaced a lot weight—my vet stated he was malnourished and severely dehydrated. His nervousness was worse than ever. The vet was so involved she truly referred to as animal management.”

The medical information corroborated Virgil’s claims, noting weight reduction, dehydration, and heightened nervousness following the boarding interval.

Testimony: Shih Tzu Proprietor, NJ

“He put the e-collar on my boyfriend on the lowest setting simply to point out us it wasn’t dangerous. He truly centered his whole pitch on my boyfriend, he was very dismissive of me for the complete time my canine was in his care, it was a bit misogynistic. However when our canine got here again, he had burns on his neck. He was dehydrated, depressing. Austin had lied to us. That collar was set manner increased. Our canine was traumatized by this collar, he’s fully totally different now from the canine we relinquished to Austin.”

Testimony: Joe S., Shih Tzu Proprietor, NY

One other proprietor, additionally of a small breed, described much more ugly accidents.

“I dropped my Shih Tzu off at what I believed was a secure spa in Previous Bridge. Austin had partnered with them, or so he claimed. Every week later, I used to be informed to choose my canine up in Newark. He gave me some excuse about flooding. Once I took my canine to the vet, they discovered a gap in his neck beneath his fur from the e-collar. Austin even deleted my Google assessment after I posted it.”

This shopper supplied screenshots of deleted evaluations and social media movies displaying Mendoza transporting a number of canine in a U-Haul truck after a falling-out with the Previous Bridge facility.

Testimony: The Former Worker

Maybe probably the most damning testimony got here from a former worker who labored beneath Mendoza for a number of months.

“Austin ran his enterprise like a circus, he had the entire Tiger King advanced. He cycled by means of workers as a result of no one lasted lengthy. He preyed on susceptible individuals who beloved canine however didn’t know any higher. I spoke up once I noticed him hurting the animals. He didn’t care. He informed us to deal with the cash. It jogged my memory of Tiger King—chaotic, exploitative, and merciless.”

This worker’s account highlights the poisonous office surroundings and systemic exploitation, extending past shoppers to workers.

The Quick Cat Incident

Mendoza’s downfall accelerated in Could 2025 on the Quick Cat occasion in Freehold, New Jersey, sanctioned by the American Kennel Membership. There, he allegedly entered an aggressive canine beneath false pretenses. Throughout the competitors, the canine attacked a decide. Witnesses say Mendoza not solely defended the canine’s actions but additionally turned combative when requested to depart.

He was subsequently banned from future AKC occasions. Later that evening, he took to social media, ranting that the canine was justified in attacking the decide.

Fraudulent Picture

Mendoza’s on-line status administration was as aggressive as his coaching strategies. Opinions reveal a suspicious sample: unfavorable posts disappeared, whereas constructive ones surged in clusters, suggesting he bought faux testimonials.

Nationwide organizations, veterinarians, {and professional} trainers have since distanced themselves. A number of confirmed they’d both been instantly harmed by Mendoza’s practices or had heard of him by means of the canine coaching grapevine.

Extortion Allegations

Maybe probably the most chilling allegation entails Mendoza’s ex-girlfriend, a vice principal in Edison, NJ. When their relationship ended, witnesses declare Mendoza retaliated by holding her canine hostage, and demanding $20,000 for its return. Ring doorbell footage captured components of the viscous confrontation.

The Greater Image: Belief Betrayed

For a lot of pet homeowners, their canine are household. Entrusting them to an expert requires huge religion. The allegations in opposition to Mendoza strike at that bond. Households who scraped collectively hundreds now really feel duped. Extra importantly, their canine—harmless, trusting creatures—could carry lifelong scars.

Animal welfare advocates argue the case underscores a necessity for stricter regulation within the pet companies trade. Not like human healthcare, anybody can name themselves a “coach,” no matter background or experience.

What Comes Subsequent

As Mendoza awaits trial, the group watches intently. If convicted, he may face years in federal jail, restitution to victims, and a lifetime ban from animal possession or associated companies.

For now, his social media pages stay largely silent, his once-boastful posts overshadowed by a rising tide of concern. In line with sources, he’s paused his dog-boarding operation, however remains to be promoting coaching programs.

Conclusion: Selecting Compassion

The story of “Dogtor Doolittle” is greater than a cautionary story about one man. It’s a reminder that compassion, transparency, and science—not worry and coercion—should information how we deal with animals. Canines will not be machines to be shocked into obedience; they’re sentient beings who belief us with their lives.

Austin Mendoza could declare innocence till his day in courtroom, however for the households who say their canine got here again damaged, the worker who tried to talk up, and the lady who nonetheless remembers the canine’ cries, the harm has already been carried out.

Hyperlinks: