Lots goes into library companies that could be invisible to a sure proportion of patrons, however that are important to others. Nonetheless, I discover it attention-grabbing (and, I admit, irritating) that your library appears to be offering the standard “library expertise” that most individuals want for–e.g., a secure place to go to heat up or cool off, use a pc freely, and take a look at supplies. What’s your beef? And what are you fixing by providing a distinct choice that can compete with the general public library and probably take away circulation numbers in such a method that it might turn out to be even *much less* “totally funded” (this may imply ANYTHING, and I strongly suspect you don’t understand how prices break down at your public library)?
The library expertise is subjective, however as a public librarian, I can let you know that libraries can’t be the whole lot to everybody, and this does typically get in the best way of oldsters utilizing them the best way they’d like to have the ability to. And that may be a disgrace. However the reply is to not provide a competing service. The reply is to get entangled in your native authorities, cross referenda that levy taxes to pay for extra/higher library companies (amongst others), and perceive that utilization = funding. You aren’t serving to your neighborhood by constructing your personal personal library. However maybe that was by no means your objective
